Model comparison

GPT-4.5 vs Qwen1.5-14B

GPT-4.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.2 to 32.7 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 15 shared benchmarks.

GPT-4.5 OpenAI

37.2

Rank #208 Confirmed

Qwen1.5-14B Alibaba (Qwen)

32.7

Rank #253 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 15 benchmarks with published results for both. GPT-4.5 scores higher in 7 categories and Qwen1.5-14B in 1 category; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where GPT-4.5 leads 56.9 to 33.6.
  • Qwen1.5-14B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

GPT-4.5 and Qwen1.5-14B specifications
GPT-4.5Qwen1.5-14B
ProviderOpenAIAlibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index37.232.7
Released2025-02-272024-02-04
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window——
Max output——
Input $ / M tokens——
Output $ / M tokens——
Results tracked4217

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding GPT-4.5 leads

GPT-4.5: 42.2 (#109), Qwen1.5-14B: 33.1 (#263)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-4.5Qwen1.5-14B
LMArena Coding13961138
Aider Polyglot44.9%—
WeirdML39.4%—
LiveBench Coding75.2%—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

GPT-4.5: 27.9 (#97), Qwen1.5-14B: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-4.5Qwen1.5-14B
Cybench17.5%—

Reasoning Qwen1.5-14B leads

GPT-4.5: 13.9 (#330), Qwen1.5-14B: 21.4 (#223)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-4.5Qwen1.5-14B
LMArena Hard Prompts14031113
ARC-AGI-20.8%—
SimpleBench34.5%—
ARC-AGI-110.3%—
EnigmaEval3.2%—
LiveBench Reasoning71.1%—
LiveBench Data Analysis64.3%—
Epoch Capabilities Index136.74—
ForecastBench61.7—
LiveBench69%—

Math Too close to call

GPT-4.5: 32.6 (#211), Qwen1.5-14B: 32.4 (#215)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-4.5Qwen1.5-14B
LMArena Math14121125
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202537.8%—
LiveBench Math69.3%—
MATH Level 578.6%—

Knowledge GPT-4.5 leads

GPT-4.5: 32.5 (#211), Qwen1.5-14B: 29.8 (#232)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-4.5Qwen1.5-14B
LMArena Expert13941094
GPQA Diamond68.7%—
Humanity's Last Exam5.4%—
Confabulations13.6%—
MMLU—68.6%

Multimodal Not comparable

GPT-4.5: 37.6 (#71), Qwen1.5-14B: —

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-4.5Qwen1.5-14B
LMArena Vision1195—
VPCT45%—

Multilingual GPT-4.5 leads

GPT-4.5: 52.5 (#83), Qwen1.5-14B: 30.7 (#262)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-4.5Qwen1.5-14B
LMArena Non-English14131095
LMArena Chinese14211147
LMArena French14181116
LMArena German14571043
LMArena Japanese14161019
LMArena Russian14191046
LMArena Korean1392—
LMArena Spanish—1085

Instruction Following GPT-4.5 leads

GPT-4.5: 72.6 (#134), Qwen1.5-14B: 56.8 (#271)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-4.5Qwen1.5-14B
LMArena Instruction Following14041102
LiveBench Instruction Following72.3%—

Long Context GPT-4.5 leads

GPT-4.5: 40.4 (#155), Qwen1.5-14B: 33.7 (#257)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-4.5Qwen1.5-14B
LMArena Longer Query14061113
Fiction.LiveBench63.9%—

Writing & Preference GPT-4.5 leads

GPT-4.5: 56.9 (#134), Qwen1.5-14B: 33.6 (#276)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-4.5Qwen1.5-14B
LMArena Text14171128
LMArena Creative Writing13941091
LMArena Multi-Turn14441110
Short-Story Creative Writing75.6%—
EQ-Bench Creative Writing1258—
LiveBench Language61.5%—

Frequently asked questions

Is GPT-4.5 better than Qwen1.5-14B?

GPT-4.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.2 to 32.7 on the Noometry Index.

Is GPT-4.5 or Qwen1.5-14B better for coding?

GPT-4.5 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 42.2 versus 33.1 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do GPT-4.5 and Qwen1.5-14B share?

15 benchmarks have published results for both models. GPT-4.5 has 42 scored results on Noometry and Qwen1.5-14B has 17.

Related comparisons

Go deeper