Model comparison
Gemma 3n E4b IT vs Qwen1.5-14B
Gemma 3n E4b IT is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.3 to 32.7 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 16 shared benchmarks.
Google
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- They share 16 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemma 3n E4b IT scores higher in 7 categories and Qwen1.5-14B in 1 category; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Gemma 3n E4b IT leads 50.1 to 33.6.
Side by side
| Gemma 3n E4b IT | Qwen1.5-14B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Alibaba (Qwen) | |
| Noometry Index | 37.3 | 32.7 |
| Released | — | 2024-02-04 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 18 | 17 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Gemma 3n E4b IT leads
Gemma 3n E4b IT: 37.0 (#198), Qwen1.5-14B: 33.1 (#263)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Qwen1.5-14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1268 | 1138 |
Reasoning Qwen1.5-14B leads
Gemma 3n E4b IT: 19.9 (#247), Qwen1.5-14B: 21.4 (#223)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Qwen1.5-14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1284 | 1113 |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 31.5% | — |
Math Gemma 3n E4b IT leads
Gemma 3n E4b IT: 35.1 (#188), Qwen1.5-14B: 32.4 (#215)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Qwen1.5-14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1251 | 1125 |
Knowledge Gemma 3n E4b IT leads
Gemma 3n E4b IT: 34.2 (#198), Qwen1.5-14B: 29.8 (#232)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Qwen1.5-14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1246 | 1094 |
| MMLU | — | 68.6% |
Multilingual Gemma 3n E4b IT leads
Gemma 3n E4b IT: 43.4 (#183), Qwen1.5-14B: 30.7 (#262)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Qwen1.5-14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1285 | 1095 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1309 | 1147 |
| LMArena French | 1330 | 1116 |
| LMArena German | 1311 | 1043 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1272 | 1019 |
| LMArena Russian | 1288 | 1046 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1305 | 1085 |
| LMArena Korean | 1259 | — |
Instruction Following Gemma 3n E4b IT leads
Gemma 3n E4b IT: 66.1 (#210), Qwen1.5-14B: 56.8 (#271)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Qwen1.5-14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1255 | 1102 |
Long Context Gemma 3n E4b IT leads
Gemma 3n E4b IT: 38.7 (#191), Qwen1.5-14B: 33.7 (#257)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Qwen1.5-14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1276 | 1113 |
Writing & Preference Gemma 3n E4b IT leads
Gemma 3n E4b IT: 50.1 (#186), Qwen1.5-14B: 33.6 (#276)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Qwen1.5-14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1306 | 1128 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1287 | 1091 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1276 | 1110 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemma 3n E4b IT better than Qwen1.5-14B?
Gemma 3n E4b IT is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.3 to 32.7 on the Noometry Index.
Is Gemma 3n E4b IT or Qwen1.5-14B better for coding?
Gemma 3n E4b IT scores higher on coding benchmarks: 37.0 versus 33.1 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Gemma 3n E4b IT and Qwen1.5-14B share?
16 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 3n E4b IT has 18 scored results on Noometry and Qwen1.5-14B has 17.