Model comparison

GLM-5V-Turbo vs Wizardlm 70b

GLM-5V-Turbo is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.1 to 32.4 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 12 shared benchmarks.

GLM-5V-Turbo Z.ai (Zhipu)

43.1

Rank #86 Confirmed

Wizardlm 70b Microsoft

32.4

Rank #245 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. GLM-5V-Turbo scores higher in 7 categories and Wizardlm 70b in 0 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where GLM-5V-Turbo leads 62.6 to 34.9.
  • Wizardlm 70b has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

GLM-5V-Turbo and Wizardlm 70b specifications
GLM-5V-TurboWizardlm 70b
ProviderZ.ai (Zhipu)Microsoft
Noometry Index43.132.4
Released2026-04-01—
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window200K—
Max output131K—
Input $ / M tokens$1.20—
Output $ / M tokens$4—
Results tracked1912

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding GLM-5V-Turbo leads

GLM-5V-Turbo: 41.8 (#105), Wizardlm 70b: 30.9 (#280)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-5V-TurboWizardlm 70b
LMArena Coding14671081
LMArena WebDev1400—

Reasoning GLM-5V-Turbo leads

GLM-5V-Turbo: 28.5 (#87), Wizardlm 70b: 19.8 (#231)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-5V-TurboWizardlm 70b
LMArena Hard Prompts14431079

Math GLM-5V-Turbo leads

GLM-5V-Turbo: 36.6 (#109), Wizardlm 70b: 29.7 (#216)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-5V-TurboWizardlm 70b
LMArena Math14401116

Knowledge Not comparable

GLM-5V-Turbo: 39.9 (#113), Wizardlm 70b: —

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-5V-TurboWizardlm 70b
LMArena Expert1451—

Multimodal Not comparable

GLM-5V-Turbo: 40.1 (#41), Wizardlm 70b: —

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-5V-TurboWizardlm 70b
LMArena Vision1264—
LMArena Document1416—

Multilingual GLM-5V-Turbo leads

GLM-5V-Turbo: 53.2 (#69), Wizardlm 70b: 29.8 (#260)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-5V-TurboWizardlm 70b
LMArena Non-English14201078
LMArena Chinese14881052
LMArena German14221083
LMArena Russian14321155
LMArena French1443—
LMArena Korean1399—
LMArena Spanish1446—

Instruction Following GLM-5V-Turbo leads

GLM-5V-Turbo: 75.1 (#75), Wizardlm 70b: 56.5 (#268)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-5V-TurboWizardlm 70b
LMArena Instruction Following14221093

Long Context GLM-5V-Turbo leads

GLM-5V-Turbo: 44.0 (#76), Wizardlm 70b: 33.3 (#258)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-5V-TurboWizardlm 70b
LMArena Longer Query14391097

Writing & Preference GLM-5V-Turbo leads

GLM-5V-Turbo: 62.6 (#69), Wizardlm 70b: 34.9 (#264)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-5V-TurboWizardlm 70b
LMArena Text14371120
LMArena Creative Writing14141149
LMArena Multi-Turn14321108

Frequently asked questions

Is GLM-5V-Turbo better than Wizardlm 70b?

GLM-5V-Turbo is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.1 to 32.4 on the Noometry Index.

Is GLM-5V-Turbo or Wizardlm 70b better for coding?

GLM-5V-Turbo scores higher on coding benchmarks: 41.8 versus 30.9 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do GLM-5V-Turbo and Wizardlm 70b share?

12 benchmarks have published results for both models. GLM-5V-Turbo has 19 scored results on Noometry and Wizardlm 70b has 12.

Related comparisons

Go deeper