Model comparison

Gemma 4 31B IT vs Wizardlm 70b

Gemma 4 31B IT is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.5 to 33.0 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 11 shared benchmarks.

Gemma 4 31B IT Google

43.5

Rank #90 Confirmed

Wizardlm 70b Microsoft

33.0

Rank #249 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 11 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemma 4 31B IT scores higher in 7 categories and Wizardlm 70b in 0 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Gemma 4 31B IT leads 60.5 to 34.8.

Side by side

Gemma 4 31B IT and Wizardlm 70b specifications
Gemma 4 31B ITWizardlm 70b
ProviderGoogleMicrosoft
Noometry Index43.533.0
Released2026-04-02—
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window262K—
Max output33K—
Input $ / M tokens$0.09—
Output $ / M tokens$0.34—
Results tracked3512

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Gemma 4 31B IT leads

Gemma 4 31B IT: 42.3 (#108), Wizardlm 70b: 31.4 (#285)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 4 31B ITWizardlm 70b
LMArena Coding14591081
LMArena WebDev1366—
SciCode43.4%—
WeirdML52.3%—
ALE-Bench925.5—

Reasoning Gemma 4 31B IT leads

Gemma 4 31B IT: 27.2 (#122), Wizardlm 70b: 20.7 (#234)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 4 31B ITWizardlm 70b
LMArena Hard Prompts14481079
Kagi LLM Benchmark63.5%—
NYT Connections (extended)70.6%—
CritPt1.4%—
Chess Puzzles5%—
Thematic Generalization53%—
DTBench82.7%—
LMCA39.3%—
Surface Evolver Bench30.6%—
Epoch Capabilities Index142.74—

Math Gemma 4 31B IT leads

Gemma 4 31B IT: 43.2 (#81), Wizardlm 70b: 32.2 (#218)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 4 31B ITWizardlm 70b
LMArena Math14651116
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202573.3%—

Knowledge Not comparable

Gemma 4 31B IT: 37.9 (#151), Wizardlm 70b: —

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 4 31B ITWizardlm 70b
GPQA Diamond75.8%—
SimpleQA Verified10.4%—
Vectara Hallucination Rate7.4%—
LMArena Expert1465—

Multimodal Not comparable

Gemma 4 31B IT: 41.6 (#34), Wizardlm 70b: —

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 4 31B ITWizardlm 70b
LMArena Vision1277—
LMArena Document1425—

Multilingual Gemma 4 31B IT leads

Gemma 4 31B IT: 53.8 (#57), Wizardlm 70b: 29.6 (#265)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 4 31B ITWizardlm 70b
LMArena Non-English14311078
LMArena Chinese14761052
LMArena Russian14601155
LMArena French1435—
LMArena German—1083
LMArena Spanish1444—

Instruction Following Gemma 4 31B IT leads

Gemma 4 31B IT: 75.5 (#61), Wizardlm 70b: 56.3 (#273)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 4 31B ITWizardlm 70b
LMArena Instruction Following14331093

Long Context Gemma 4 31B IT leads

Gemma 4 31B IT: 44.2 (#71), Wizardlm 70b: 33.3 (#263)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 4 31B ITWizardlm 70b
LMArena Longer Query14461097

Writing & Preference Gemma 4 31B IT leads

Gemma 4 31B IT: 60.5 (#96), Wizardlm 70b: 34.8 (#269)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 4 31B ITWizardlm 70b
LMArena Text14431120
LMArena Creative Writing14151149
LMArena Multi-Turn14521108
EQ-Bench Creative Writing1368—
EQ-Bench 41120—

Frequently asked questions

Is Gemma 4 31B IT better than Wizardlm 70b?

Gemma 4 31B IT is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.5 to 33.0 on the Noometry Index.

Is Gemma 4 31B IT or Wizardlm 70b better for coding?

Gemma 4 31B IT scores higher on coding benchmarks: 42.3 versus 31.4 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Gemma 4 31B IT and Wizardlm 70b share?

11 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 4 31B IT has 35 scored results on Noometry and Wizardlm 70b has 12.

Related comparisons

Go deeper