Model comparison
GLM-5V-Turbo vs Granite 3.1 2b Instruct
GLM-5V-Turbo is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.1 to 32.6 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 12 shared benchmarks.
Summary
- They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. GLM-5V-Turbo scores higher in 8 categories and Granite 3.1 2b Instruct in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where GLM-5V-Turbo leads 62.6 to 34.3.
- Granite 3.1 2b Instruct has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| GLM-5V-Turbo | Granite 3.1 2b Instruct | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Z.ai (Zhipu) | IBM |
| Noometry Index | 43.1 | 32.6 |
| Released | 2026-04-01 | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | 200K | — |
| Max output | 131K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $1.20 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $4 | — |
| Results tracked | 19 | 12 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding GLM-5V-Turbo leads
GLM-5V-Turbo: 41.8 (#105), Granite 3.1 2b Instruct: 32.9 (#255)
| Benchmark | GLM-5V-Turbo | Granite 3.1 2b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1467 | 1149 |
| LMArena WebDev | 1400 | — |
Reasoning GLM-5V-Turbo leads
GLM-5V-Turbo: 28.5 (#87), Granite 3.1 2b Instruct: 21.0 (#206)
| Benchmark | GLM-5V-Turbo | Granite 3.1 2b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1443 | 1138 |
Math GLM-5V-Turbo leads
GLM-5V-Turbo: 36.6 (#109), Granite 3.1 2b Instruct: 30.6 (#206)
| Benchmark | GLM-5V-Turbo | Granite 3.1 2b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1440 | 1159 |
Knowledge GLM-5V-Turbo leads
GLM-5V-Turbo: 39.9 (#113), Granite 3.1 2b Instruct: 30.3 (#223)
| Benchmark | GLM-5V-Turbo | Granite 3.1 2b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1451 | 1131 |
Multimodal Not comparable
GLM-5V-Turbo: 40.1 (#41), Granite 3.1 2b Instruct: —
| Benchmark | GLM-5V-Turbo | Granite 3.1 2b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1264 | — |
| LMArena Document | 1416 | — |
Multilingual GLM-5V-Turbo leads
GLM-5V-Turbo: 53.2 (#69), Granite 3.1 2b Instruct: 29.2 (#264)
| Benchmark | GLM-5V-Turbo | Granite 3.1 2b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1420 | 1068 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1488 | 1138 |
| LMArena Russian | 1432 | 1063 |
| LMArena French | 1443 | — |
| LMArena German | 1422 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1399 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1446 | — |
Instruction Following GLM-5V-Turbo leads
GLM-5V-Turbo: 75.1 (#75), Granite 3.1 2b Instruct: 58.0 (#259)
| Benchmark | GLM-5V-Turbo | Granite 3.1 2b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1422 | 1116 |
Long Context GLM-5V-Turbo leads
GLM-5V-Turbo: 44.0 (#76), Granite 3.1 2b Instruct: 35.0 (#239)
| Benchmark | GLM-5V-Turbo | Granite 3.1 2b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1439 | 1155 |
Writing & Preference GLM-5V-Turbo leads
GLM-5V-Turbo: 62.6 (#69), Granite 3.1 2b Instruct: 34.3 (#269)
| Benchmark | GLM-5V-Turbo | Granite 3.1 2b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1437 | 1127 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1414 | 1116 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1432 | 1099 |
Frequently asked questions
Is GLM-5V-Turbo better than Granite 3.1 2b Instruct?
GLM-5V-Turbo is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.1 to 32.6 on the Noometry Index.
Is GLM-5V-Turbo or Granite 3.1 2b Instruct better for coding?
GLM-5V-Turbo scores higher on coding benchmarks: 41.8 versus 32.9 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do GLM-5V-Turbo and Granite 3.1 2b Instruct share?
12 benchmarks have published results for both models. GLM-5V-Turbo has 19 scored results on Noometry and Granite 3.1 2b Instruct has 12.