Model comparison

GLM-5V-Turbo vs Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B

GLM-5V-Turbo is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.8 to 33.0 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 11 shared benchmarks.

Summary

  • They share 11 benchmarks with published results for both. GLM-5V-Turbo scores higher in 8 categories and Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in math, where GLM-5V-Turbo leads 39.4 to 14.2.
  • Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

GLM-5V-Turbo and Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B specifications
GLM-5V-TurboTulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B
ProviderZ.ai (Zhipu)Allen Institute for AI (Ai2)
Noometry Index43.833.0
Released2026-04-012024-11-21
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window200K—
Max output131K—
Input $ / M tokens$1.20—
Output $ / M tokens$4—
Results tracked1914

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding GLM-5V-Turbo leads

GLM-5V-Turbo: 42.1 (#111), Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B: 36.0 (#214)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-5V-TurboTulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B
LMArena Coding14661235
LMArena WebDev1401—

Reasoning GLM-5V-Turbo leads

GLM-5V-Turbo: 29.7 (#89), Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B: 23.9 (#169)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-5V-TurboTulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B
LMArena Hard Prompts14431220

Math GLM-5V-Turbo leads

GLM-5V-Turbo: 39.4 (#106), Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B: 14.2 (#303)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-5V-TurboTulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B
LMArena Math14411242
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—4.4%
MATH Level 5—42.7%

Knowledge GLM-5V-Turbo leads

GLM-5V-Turbo: 40.6 (#117), Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B: 25.0 (#264)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-5V-TurboTulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B
GPQA Diamond—46.3%
LMArena Expert1452—

Multimodal Not comparable

GLM-5V-Turbo: 40.9 (#42), Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B: —

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-5V-TurboTulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B
LMArena Vision1264—
LMArena Document1416—

Multilingual GLM-5V-Turbo leads

GLM-5V-Turbo: 53.0 (#73), Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B: 39.9 (#222)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-5V-TurboTulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B
LMArena Non-English14201236
LMArena Chinese14881249
LMArena Russian14311246
LMArena French1444—
LMArena German1423—
LMArena Korean1396—
LMArena Spanish1450—

Instruction Following GLM-5V-Turbo leads

GLM-5V-Turbo: 75.0 (#80), Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B: 64.8 (#227)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-5V-TurboTulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B
LMArena Instruction Following14231233

Long Context GLM-5V-Turbo leads

GLM-5V-Turbo: 44.0 (#80), Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B: 37.1 (#222)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-5V-TurboTulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B
LMArena Longer Query14381224

Writing & Preference GLM-5V-Turbo leads

GLM-5V-Turbo: 62.5 (#73), Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B: 45.6 (#223)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-5V-TurboTulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B
LMArena Text14371256
LMArena Creative Writing14161231
LMArena Multi-Turn14321252

Frequently asked questions

Is GLM-5V-Turbo better than Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B?

GLM-5V-Turbo is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.8 to 33.0 on the Noometry Index.

Is GLM-5V-Turbo or Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B better for coding?

GLM-5V-Turbo scores higher on coding benchmarks: 42.1 versus 36.0 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do GLM-5V-Turbo and Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B share?

11 benchmarks have published results for both models. GLM-5V-Turbo has 19 scored results on Noometry and Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B has 14.

Related comparisons

Go deeper