Model comparison
ERNIE 5.1 vs Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B
ERNIE 5.1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.8 to 33.0 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 11 shared benchmarks.
Baidu
Allen Institute for AI (Ai2)Summary
- They share 11 benchmarks with published results for both. ERNIE 5.1 scores higher in 7 categories and Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B in 1 category; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where ERNIE 5.1 leads 40.3 to 14.2.
- Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| ERNIE 5.1 | Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Baidu | Allen Institute for AI (Ai2) |
| Noometry Index | 43.8 | 33.0 |
| Released | — | 2024-11-21 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 19 | 14 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding ERNIE 5.1 leads
ERNIE 5.1: 44.0 (#76), Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B: 36.0 (#214)
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.1 | Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1488 | 1235 |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
ERNIE 5.1: —, Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B: —
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.1 | Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Search | 1227 | — |
Reasoning Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B leads
ERNIE 5.1: 21.9 (#211), Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B: 23.9 (#169)
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.1 | Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1481 | 1220 |
| NYT Connections (extended) | 23.4% | — |
Math ERNIE 5.1 leads
ERNIE 5.1: 40.3 (#92), Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B: 14.2 (#303)
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.1 | Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1481 | 1242 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 4.4% |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 42.7% |
Knowledge ERNIE 5.1 leads
ERNIE 5.1: 41.9 (#102), Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B: 25.0 (#264)
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.1 | Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 46.3% |
| LMArena Expert | 1492 | — |
Multilingual ERNIE 5.1 leads
ERNIE 5.1: 55.5 (#29), Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B: 39.9 (#222)
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.1 | Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1454 | 1236 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1508 | 1249 |
| LMArena Russian | 1459 | 1246 |
| LMArena French | 1488 | — |
| LMArena German | 1470 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1422 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1427 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1473 | — |
Instruction Following ERNIE 5.1 leads
ERNIE 5.1: 76.7 (#37), Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B: 64.8 (#227)
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.1 | Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1460 | 1233 |
Long Context ERNIE 5.1 leads
ERNIE 5.1: 44.7 (#59), Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B: 37.1 (#222)
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.1 | Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1462 | 1224 |
Writing & Preference ERNIE 5.1 leads
ERNIE 5.1: 65.1 (#52), Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B: 45.6 (#223)
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.1 | Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1468 | 1256 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1441 | 1231 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1471 | 1252 |
Frequently asked questions
Is ERNIE 5.1 better than Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B?
ERNIE 5.1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.8 to 33.0 on the Noometry Index.
Is ERNIE 5.1 or Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B better for coding?
ERNIE 5.1 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 44.0 versus 36.0 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do ERNIE 5.1 and Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B share?
11 benchmarks have published results for both models. ERNIE 5.1 has 19 scored results on Noometry and Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B has 14.