Model comparison

GLM-5V-Turbo vs Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct

GLM-5V-Turbo is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.1 to 29.1 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 16 shared benchmarks.

GLM-5V-Turbo Z.ai (Zhipu)

43.1

Rank #86 Confirmed

Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct Microsoft

29.1

Rank #303 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 16 benchmarks with published results for both. GLM-5V-Turbo scores higher in 8 categories and Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where GLM-5V-Turbo leads 62.6 to 27.3.
  • Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

GLM-5V-Turbo and Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct specifications
GLM-5V-TurboPhi 3 Mini 128k Instruct
ProviderZ.ai (Zhipu)Microsoft
Noometry Index43.129.1
Released2026-04-012024-04-23
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window200K—
Max output131K—
Input $ / M tokens$1.20—
Output $ / M tokens$4—
Results tracked1919

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding GLM-5V-Turbo leads

GLM-5V-Turbo: 41.8 (#105), Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 28.3 (#307)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-5V-TurboPhi 3 Mini 128k Instruct
LMArena Coding14671040
LMArena WebDev1400—
BigCodeBench Instruct—29.6%
BigCodeBench Complete—40.6%

Reasoning GLM-5V-Turbo leads

GLM-5V-Turbo: 28.5 (#87), Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 18.7 (#254)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-5V-TurboPhi 3 Mini 128k Instruct
LMArena Hard Prompts14431028

Math GLM-5V-Turbo leads

GLM-5V-Turbo: 36.6 (#109), Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 29.2 (#220)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-5V-TurboPhi 3 Mini 128k Instruct
LMArena Math14401089

Knowledge GLM-5V-Turbo leads

GLM-5V-Turbo: 39.9 (#113), Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 26.3 (#251)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-5V-TurboPhi 3 Mini 128k Instruct
LMArena Expert1451984

Multimodal Not comparable

GLM-5V-Turbo: 40.1 (#41), Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: —

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-5V-TurboPhi 3 Mini 128k Instruct
LMArena Vision1264—
LMArena Document1416—

Multilingual GLM-5V-Turbo leads

GLM-5V-Turbo: 53.2 (#69), Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 25.4 (#280)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-5V-TurboPhi 3 Mini 128k Instruct
LMArena Non-English14201000
LMArena Chinese14881016
LMArena French14431038
LMArena German14221006
LMArena Korean1399856
LMArena Russian14321004
LMArena Spanish14461058
LMArena Japanese—899

Instruction Following GLM-5V-Turbo leads

GLM-5V-Turbo: 75.1 (#75), Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 52.1 (#289)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-5V-TurboPhi 3 Mini 128k Instruct
LMArena Instruction Following14221023

Long Context GLM-5V-Turbo leads

GLM-5V-Turbo: 44.0 (#76), Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 30.3 (#284)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-5V-TurboPhi 3 Mini 128k Instruct
LMArena Longer Query1439996

Writing & Preference GLM-5V-Turbo leads

GLM-5V-Turbo: 62.6 (#69), Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 27.3 (#296)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-5V-TurboPhi 3 Mini 128k Instruct
LMArena Text14371050
LMArena Creative Writing14141024
LMArena Multi-Turn1432989

Frequently asked questions

Is GLM-5V-Turbo better than Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct?

GLM-5V-Turbo is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.1 to 29.1 on the Noometry Index.

Is GLM-5V-Turbo or Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct better for coding?

GLM-5V-Turbo scores higher on coding benchmarks: 41.8 versus 28.3 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do GLM-5V-Turbo and Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct share?

16 benchmarks have published results for both models. GLM-5V-Turbo has 19 scored results on Noometry and Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct has 19.

Related comparisons

Go deeper