Model comparison

Gemma 4 31B IT vs Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct

Gemma 4 31B IT is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.5 to 29.7 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 14 shared benchmarks.

Gemma 4 31B IT Google

43.5

Rank #90 Confirmed

Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct Microsoft

29.7

Rank #305 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 14 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemma 4 31B IT scores higher in 8 categories and Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Gemma 4 31B IT leads 60.5 to 27.1.

Side by side

Gemma 4 31B IT and Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct specifications
Gemma 4 31B ITPhi 3 Mini 128k Instruct
ProviderGoogleMicrosoft
Noometry Index43.529.7
Released2026-04-022024-04-23
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window262K—
Max output33K—
Input $ / M tokens$0.09—
Output $ / M tokens$0.34—
Results tracked3519

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Gemma 4 31B IT leads

Gemma 4 31B IT: 42.3 (#108), Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 28.8 (#312)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 4 31B ITPhi 3 Mini 128k Instruct
LMArena Coding14591039
LMArena WebDev1366—
SciCode43.4%—
WeirdML52.3%—
BigCodeBench Instruct—29.6%
BigCodeBench Complete—40.6%
ALE-Bench925.5—

Reasoning Gemma 4 31B IT leads

Gemma 4 31B IT: 27.2 (#122), Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 19.6 (#256)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 4 31B ITPhi 3 Mini 128k Instruct
LMArena Hard Prompts14481028
Kagi LLM Benchmark63.5%—
NYT Connections (extended)70.6%—
CritPt1.4%—
Chess Puzzles5%—
Thematic Generalization53%—
DTBench82.7%—
LMCA39.3%—
Surface Evolver Bench30.6%—
Epoch Capabilities Index142.74—

Math Gemma 4 31B IT leads

Gemma 4 31B IT: 43.2 (#81), Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 31.6 (#222)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 4 31B ITPhi 3 Mini 128k Instruct
LMArena Math14651089
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202573.3%—

Knowledge Gemma 4 31B IT leads

Gemma 4 31B IT: 37.9 (#151), Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 26.8 (#254)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 4 31B ITPhi 3 Mini 128k Instruct
LMArena Expert1465984
GPQA Diamond75.8%—
SimpleQA Verified10.4%—
Vectara Hallucination Rate7.4%—

Multimodal Not comparable

Gemma 4 31B IT: 41.6 (#34), Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: —

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 4 31B ITPhi 3 Mini 128k Instruct
LMArena Vision1277—
LMArena Document1425—

Multilingual Gemma 4 31B IT leads

Gemma 4 31B IT: 53.8 (#57), Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 25.2 (#285)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 4 31B ITPhi 3 Mini 128k Instruct
LMArena Non-English14311000
LMArena Chinese14761016
LMArena French14351039
LMArena Russian14601004
LMArena Spanish14441059
LMArena German—1006
LMArena Japanese—899
LMArena Korean—856

Instruction Following Gemma 4 31B IT leads

Gemma 4 31B IT: 75.5 (#61), Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 51.8 (#294)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 4 31B ITPhi 3 Mini 128k Instruct
LMArena Instruction Following14331023

Long Context Gemma 4 31B IT leads

Gemma 4 31B IT: 44.2 (#71), Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 30.4 (#289)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 4 31B ITPhi 3 Mini 128k Instruct
LMArena Longer Query1446996

Writing & Preference Gemma 4 31B IT leads

Gemma 4 31B IT: 60.5 (#96), Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 27.1 (#301)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 4 31B ITPhi 3 Mini 128k Instruct
LMArena Text14431050
LMArena Creative Writing14151024
LMArena Multi-Turn1452989
EQ-Bench Creative Writing1368—
EQ-Bench 41120—

Frequently asked questions

Is Gemma 4 31B IT better than Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct?

Gemma 4 31B IT is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.5 to 29.7 on the Noometry Index.

Is Gemma 4 31B IT or Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct better for coding?

Gemma 4 31B IT scores higher on coding benchmarks: 42.3 versus 28.8 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Gemma 4 31B IT and Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct share?

14 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 4 31B IT has 35 scored results on Noometry and Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct has 19.

Related comparisons

Go deeper