Model comparison

GLM-5V-Turbo vs Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct

GLM-5V-Turbo is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.8 to 27.9 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 16 shared benchmarks.

GLM-5V-Turbo Z.ai (Zhipu)

43.8

Rank #84 Confirmed

Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct Microsoft

27.9

Rank #328 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 16 benchmarks with published results for both. GLM-5V-Turbo scores higher in 8 categories and Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where GLM-5V-Turbo leads 62.5 to 27.6.
  • Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

GLM-5V-Turbo and Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct specifications
GLM-5V-TurboPhi 3 Mini 4k Instruct
ProviderZ.ai (Zhipu)Microsoft
Noometry Index43.827.9
Released2026-04-012024-04-23
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window200K—
Max output131K—
Input $ / M tokens$1.20—
Output $ / M tokens$4—
Results tracked1935

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding GLM-5V-Turbo leads

GLM-5V-Turbo: 42.1 (#111), Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct: 26.6 (#323)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-5V-TurboPhi 3 Mini 4k Instruct
LMArena Coding14661093
LMArena WebDev1401—
LiveBench Coding—15.5%
HumanEval+—59.1%
MBPP+—54.2%

Reasoning GLM-5V-Turbo leads

GLM-5V-Turbo: 29.7 (#89), Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct: 14.1 (#328)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-5V-TurboPhi 3 Mini 4k Instruct
LMArena Hard Prompts14431072
Chess Puzzles—0%
LiveBench Reasoning—26.8%
LiveBench Data Analysis—34.7%
Adversarial NLI—52.8%
BIG-Bench Hard—71.7%
HellaSwag—76.7%
LiveBench—22.4%
WinoGrande—70.8%

Math GLM-5V-Turbo leads

GLM-5V-Turbo: 39.4 (#106), Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct: 26.6 (#257)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-5V-TurboPhi 3 Mini 4k Instruct
LMArena Math14411111
LiveBench Math—15.7%

Knowledge GLM-5V-Turbo leads

GLM-5V-Turbo: 40.6 (#117), Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct: 28.5 (#246)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-5V-TurboPhi 3 Mini 4k Instruct
LMArena Expert14521045
ARC (AI2) Challenge—84.9%
MMLU—68.8%
OpenBookQA—88%
TriviaQA—64%

Multimodal Not comparable

GLM-5V-Turbo: 40.9 (#42), Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct: —

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-5V-TurboPhi 3 Mini 4k Instruct
LMArena Vision1264—
LMArena Document1416—

Multilingual GLM-5V-Turbo leads

GLM-5V-Turbo: 53.0 (#73), Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct: 26.3 (#280)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-5V-TurboPhi 3 Mini 4k Instruct
LMArena Non-English14201021
LMArena Chinese14881021
LMArena French14441076
LMArena German14231044
LMArena Korean1396905
LMArena Russian14311022
LMArena Spanish14501085
LMArena Japanese—935

Instruction Following GLM-5V-Turbo leads

GLM-5V-Turbo: 75.0 (#80), Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct: 47.7 (#303)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-5V-TurboPhi 3 Mini 4k Instruct
LMArena Instruction Following14231053
LiveBench Instruction Following—39.1%

Long Context GLM-5V-Turbo leads

GLM-5V-Turbo: 44.0 (#80), Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct: 31.7 (#276)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-5V-TurboPhi 3 Mini 4k Instruct
LMArena Longer Query14381044

Writing & Preference GLM-5V-Turbo leads

GLM-5V-Turbo: 62.5 (#73), Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct: 27.6 (#300)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-5V-TurboPhi 3 Mini 4k Instruct
LMArena Text14371073
LMArena Creative Writing14161037
LMArena Multi-Turn14321018
LiveBench Language—9.2%

Frequently asked questions

Is GLM-5V-Turbo better than Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct?

GLM-5V-Turbo is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.8 to 27.9 on the Noometry Index.

Is GLM-5V-Turbo or Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct better for coding?

GLM-5V-Turbo scores higher on coding benchmarks: 42.1 versus 26.6 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do GLM-5V-Turbo and Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct share?

16 benchmarks have published results for both models. GLM-5V-Turbo has 19 scored results on Noometry and Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct has 35.

Related comparisons

Go deeper