Model comparison

GLM-5V-Turbo vs Granite 3.0 2b Instruct

GLM-5V-Turbo is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.1 to 30.2 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 12 shared benchmarks.

GLM-5V-Turbo Z.ai (Zhipu)

43.1

Rank #86 Confirmed

Granite 3.0 2b Instruct IBM

30.2

Rank #284 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. GLM-5V-Turbo scores higher in 8 categories and Granite 3.0 2b Instruct in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where GLM-5V-Turbo leads 62.6 to 29.8.
  • Granite 3.0 2b Instruct has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

GLM-5V-Turbo and Granite 3.0 2b Instruct specifications
GLM-5V-TurboGranite 3.0 2b Instruct
ProviderZ.ai (Zhipu)IBM
Noometry Index43.130.2
Released2026-04-01—
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window200K—
Max output131K—
Input $ / M tokens$1.20—
Output $ / M tokens$4—
Results tracked1913

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding GLM-5V-Turbo leads

GLM-5V-Turbo: 41.8 (#105), Granite 3.0 2b Instruct: 27.8 (#311)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-5V-TurboGranite 3.0 2b Instruct
LMArena Coding14671090
LMArena WebDev1400—
BigCodeBench Instruct—20.5%

Reasoning GLM-5V-Turbo leads

GLM-5V-Turbo: 28.5 (#87), Granite 3.0 2b Instruct: 19.6 (#234)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-5V-TurboGranite 3.0 2b Instruct
LMArena Hard Prompts14431073

Math GLM-5V-Turbo leads

GLM-5V-Turbo: 36.6 (#109), Granite 3.0 2b Instruct: 29.7 (#215)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-5V-TurboGranite 3.0 2b Instruct
LMArena Math14401117

Knowledge GLM-5V-Turbo leads

GLM-5V-Turbo: 39.9 (#113), Granite 3.0 2b Instruct: 28.4 (#238)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-5V-TurboGranite 3.0 2b Instruct
LMArena Expert14511064

Multimodal Not comparable

GLM-5V-Turbo: 40.1 (#41), Granite 3.0 2b Instruct: —

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-5V-TurboGranite 3.0 2b Instruct
LMArena Vision1264—
LMArena Document1416—

Multilingual GLM-5V-Turbo leads

GLM-5V-Turbo: 53.2 (#69), Granite 3.0 2b Instruct: 27.1 (#273)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-5V-TurboGranite 3.0 2b Instruct
LMArena Non-English14201033
LMArena Chinese14881070
LMArena Russian14321045
LMArena French1443—
LMArena German1422—
LMArena Korean1399—
LMArena Spanish1446—

Instruction Following GLM-5V-Turbo leads

GLM-5V-Turbo: 75.1 (#75), Granite 3.0 2b Instruct: 54.2 (#279)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-5V-TurboGranite 3.0 2b Instruct
LMArena Instruction Following14221056

Long Context GLM-5V-Turbo leads

GLM-5V-Turbo: 44.0 (#76), Granite 3.0 2b Instruct: 32.5 (#263)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-5V-TurboGranite 3.0 2b Instruct
LMArena Longer Query14391071

Writing & Preference GLM-5V-Turbo leads

GLM-5V-Turbo: 62.6 (#69), Granite 3.0 2b Instruct: 29.8 (#287)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-5V-TurboGranite 3.0 2b Instruct
LMArena Text14371080
LMArena Creative Writing14141046
LMArena Multi-Turn14321053

Frequently asked questions

Is GLM-5V-Turbo better than Granite 3.0 2b Instruct?

GLM-5V-Turbo is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.1 to 30.2 on the Noometry Index.

Is GLM-5V-Turbo or Granite 3.0 2b Instruct better for coding?

GLM-5V-Turbo scores higher on coding benchmarks: 41.8 versus 27.8 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do GLM-5V-Turbo and Granite 3.0 2b Instruct share?

12 benchmarks have published results for both models. GLM-5V-Turbo has 19 scored results on Noometry and Granite 3.0 2b Instruct has 13.

Related comparisons

Go deeper