Model comparison

Gemma 4 31B IT vs Granite 3.0 2b Instruct

Gemma 4 31B IT is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.2 to 30.2 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 12 shared benchmarks.

Gemma 4 31B IT Google

43.2

Rank #85 Confirmed

Granite 3.0 2b Instruct IBM

30.2

Rank #284 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemma 4 31B IT scores higher in 8 categories and Granite 3.0 2b Instruct in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Gemma 4 31B IT leads 60.7 to 29.8.

Side by side

Gemma 4 31B IT and Granite 3.0 2b Instruct specifications
Gemma 4 31B ITGranite 3.0 2b Instruct
ProviderGoogleIBM
Noometry Index43.230.2
Released2026-04-02—
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window262K—
Max output33K—
Input $ / M tokens$0.09—
Output $ / M tokens$0.34—
Results tracked3513

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Gemma 4 31B IT leads

Gemma 4 31B IT: 41.9 (#98), Granite 3.0 2b Instruct: 27.8 (#311)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 4 31B ITGranite 3.0 2b Instruct
LMArena Coding14591090
LMArena WebDev1364—
SciCode43.4%—
WeirdML52.3%—
BigCodeBench Instruct—20.5%
ALE-Bench925.5—

Reasoning Gemma 4 31B IT leads

Gemma 4 31B IT: 26.4 (#119), Granite 3.0 2b Instruct: 19.6 (#234)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 4 31B ITGranite 3.0 2b Instruct
LMArena Hard Prompts14481073
Kagi LLM Benchmark63.5%—
NYT Connections (extended)70.6%—
CritPt1.4%—
Chess Puzzles5%—
Thematic Generalization53%—
DTBench82.7%—
LMCA39.3%—
Surface Evolver Bench30.6%—
Epoch Capabilities Index142.74—

Math Gemma 4 31B IT leads

Gemma 4 31B IT: 41.3 (#72), Granite 3.0 2b Instruct: 29.7 (#215)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 4 31B ITGranite 3.0 2b Instruct
LMArena Math14641117
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202573.3%—

Knowledge Gemma 4 31B IT leads

Gemma 4 31B IT: 37.9 (#141), Granite 3.0 2b Instruct: 28.4 (#238)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 4 31B ITGranite 3.0 2b Instruct
LMArena Expert14651064
GPQA Diamond75.8%—
SimpleQA Verified10.4%—
Vectara Hallucination Rate7.4%—

Multimodal Not comparable

Gemma 4 31B IT: 41.0 (#32), Granite 3.0 2b Instruct: —

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 4 31B ITGranite 3.0 2b Instruct
LMArena Vision1278—
LMArena Document1425—

Multilingual Gemma 4 31B IT leads

Gemma 4 31B IT: 54.0 (#52), Granite 3.0 2b Instruct: 27.1 (#273)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 4 31B ITGranite 3.0 2b Instruct
LMArena Non-English14311033
LMArena Chinese14781070
LMArena Russian14621045
LMArena French1436—
LMArena Spanish1443—

Instruction Following Gemma 4 31B IT leads

Gemma 4 31B IT: 75.6 (#58), Granite 3.0 2b Instruct: 54.2 (#279)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 4 31B ITGranite 3.0 2b Instruct
LMArena Instruction Following14331056

Long Context Gemma 4 31B IT leads

Gemma 4 31B IT: 44.2 (#67), Granite 3.0 2b Instruct: 32.5 (#263)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 4 31B ITGranite 3.0 2b Instruct
LMArena Longer Query14461071

Writing & Preference Gemma 4 31B IT leads

Gemma 4 31B IT: 60.7 (#92), Granite 3.0 2b Instruct: 29.8 (#287)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 4 31B ITGranite 3.0 2b Instruct
LMArena Text14431080
LMArena Creative Writing14161046
LMArena Multi-Turn14521053
EQ-Bench Creative Writing1368—
EQ-Bench 41120—

Frequently asked questions

Is Gemma 4 31B IT better than Granite 3.0 2b Instruct?

Gemma 4 31B IT is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.2 to 30.2 on the Noometry Index.

Is Gemma 4 31B IT or Granite 3.0 2b Instruct better for coding?

Gemma 4 31B IT scores higher on coding benchmarks: 41.9 versus 27.8 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Gemma 4 31B IT and Granite 3.0 2b Instruct share?

12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 4 31B IT has 35 scored results on Noometry and Granite 3.0 2b Instruct has 13.

Related comparisons

Go deeper