Model comparison

Codellama 34b Instruct vs GLM-5V-Turbo

GLM-5V-Turbo is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.1 to 30.2 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 10 shared benchmarks.

Codellama 34b Instruct Meta

30.2

Rank #285 Confirmed

GLM-5V-Turbo Z.ai (Zhipu)

43.1

Rank #86 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 10 benchmarks with published results for both. Codellama 34b Instruct scores higher in 0 categories and GLM-5V-Turbo in 7 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where GLM-5V-Turbo leads 62.6 to 28.4.
  • Codellama 34b Instruct has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Codellama 34b Instruct and GLM-5V-Turbo specifications
Codellama 34b InstructGLM-5V-Turbo
ProviderMetaZ.ai (Zhipu)
Noometry Index30.243.1
Released—2026-04-01
WeightsOpenProprietary
Context window—200K
Max output—131K
Input $ / M tokens—$1.20
Output $ / M tokens—$4
Results tracked1419

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding GLM-5V-Turbo leads

Codellama 34b Instruct: 28.0 (#310), GLM-5V-Turbo: 41.8 (#105)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkCodellama 34b InstructGLM-5V-Turbo
LMArena Coding10461467
LMArena WebDev—1400
BigCodeBench Instruct29%—
BigCodeBench Complete37.1%—
HumanEval+43.9%—
MBPP+56.3%—

Reasoning GLM-5V-Turbo leads

Codellama 34b Instruct: 18.8 (#250), GLM-5V-Turbo: 28.5 (#87)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkCodellama 34b InstructGLM-5V-Turbo
LMArena Hard Prompts10321443

Math GLM-5V-Turbo leads

Codellama 34b Instruct: 28.5 (#227), GLM-5V-Turbo: 36.6 (#109)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkCodellama 34b InstructGLM-5V-Turbo
LMArena Math10561440

Knowledge Not comparable

Codellama 34b Instruct: —, GLM-5V-Turbo: 39.9 (#113)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkCodellama 34b InstructGLM-5V-Turbo
LMArena Expert—1451

Multimodal Not comparable

Codellama 34b Instruct: —, GLM-5V-Turbo: 40.1 (#41)

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkCodellama 34b InstructGLM-5V-Turbo
LMArena Vision—1264
LMArena Document—1416

Multilingual GLM-5V-Turbo leads

Codellama 34b Instruct: 25.9 (#279), GLM-5V-Turbo: 53.2 (#69)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkCodellama 34b InstructGLM-5V-Turbo
LMArena Non-English10111420
LMArena Chinese9761488
LMArena French—1443
LMArena German—1422
LMArena Korean—1399
LMArena Russian—1432
LMArena Spanish—1446

Instruction Following GLM-5V-Turbo leads

Codellama 34b Instruct: 52.4 (#286), GLM-5V-Turbo: 75.1 (#75)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkCodellama 34b InstructGLM-5V-Turbo
LMArena Instruction Following10281422

Long Context GLM-5V-Turbo leads

Codellama 34b Instruct: 30.8 (#279), GLM-5V-Turbo: 44.0 (#76)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkCodellama 34b InstructGLM-5V-Turbo
LMArena Longer Query10141439

Writing & Preference GLM-5V-Turbo leads

Codellama 34b Instruct: 28.4 (#292), GLM-5V-Turbo: 62.6 (#69)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkCodellama 34b InstructGLM-5V-Turbo
LMArena Text10661437
LMArena Creative Writing10321414
LMArena Multi-Turn10151432

Frequently asked questions

Is Codellama 34b Instruct better than GLM-5V-Turbo?

GLM-5V-Turbo is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.1 to 30.2 on the Noometry Index.

Is Codellama 34b Instruct or GLM-5V-Turbo better for coding?

GLM-5V-Turbo scores higher on coding benchmarks: 41.8 versus 28.0 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Codellama 34b Instruct and GLM-5V-Turbo share?

10 benchmarks have published results for both models. Codellama 34b Instruct has 14 scored results on Noometry and GLM-5V-Turbo has 19.

Related comparisons

Go deeper