Noometry

Model comparison

Hunyuan Large Vision vs Kimi K2.5

Kimi K2.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 47.8 to 37.0 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 13 shared benchmarks.

Hunyuan Large Vision Tencent

37.0

Rank #198 Confirmed

Kimi K2.5 Moonshot AI

47.8

Rank #50 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 13 benchmarks with published results for both. Hunyuan Large Vision scores higher in 0 categories and Kimi K2.5 in 9 categories; 9 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in knowledge, where Kimi K2.5 leads 53.6 to 33.7.
  • Kimi K2.5 has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Hunyuan Large VisionKimi K2.5
ProviderTencentMoonshot AI
Noometry Index37.047.8
Released—2026-01-27
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window—262K
Max output—262K
Input $ / M tokens—$0.45
Output $ / M tokens—$2.25
Results tracked1351

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Kimi K2.5 leads

Hunyuan Large Vision: 37.6 (#176), Kimi K2.5: 48.7 (#48)

BenchmarkHunyuan Large VisionKimi K2.5
LMArena Coding13071474
SWE-bench Verified—73.8%
SWE-bench Verified (bash only)—70.8%
LMArena WebDev—1436
SWE-bench Multilingual—67.3%
SciCode—49%
WeirdML—45.6%
ALE-Bench—821.65

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Hunyuan Large Vision: —, Kimi K2.5: 34.0 (#44)

BenchmarkHunyuan Large VisionKimi K2.5
Terminal-Bench—43.2%
OSWorld—63.3%
Vending-Bench 2—1,198

Reasoning Kimi K2.5 leads

Hunyuan Large Vision: 23.8 (#160), Kimi K2.5: 31.2 (#74)

BenchmarkHunyuan Large VisionKimi K2.5
LMArena Hard Prompts12571454
ARC-AGI-2—11.8%
SimpleBench—46.8%
Kagi LLM Benchmark—78.5%
NYT Connections (extended)—69.9%
ARC-AGI-1—65.3%
CritPt—3.1%
Chess Puzzles—12%
EnigmaEval—3.4%
Thematic Generalization—69.4%
Epoch Capabilities Index—148.05

Math Kimi K2.5 leads

Hunyuan Large Vision: 32.8 (#184), Kimi K2.5: 50.3 (#46)

BenchmarkHunyuan Large VisionKimi K2.5
LMArena Math12691470
MathArena Final-Answer Competitions—62.3%
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—92.2%
FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set)—27.9%
FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1)—4.2%

Knowledge Kimi K2.5 leads

Hunyuan Large Vision: 33.7 (#191), Kimi K2.5: 53.6 (#52)

BenchmarkHunyuan Large VisionKimi K2.5
LMArena Expert12501466
GPQA Diamond—87.6%
Humanity's Last Exam—24.4%
SimpleQA Verified—34.3%
Vectara Hallucination Rate—14.2%

Multimodal Kimi K2.5 leads

Hunyuan Large Vision: 35.1 (#79), Kimi K2.5: 40.4 (#37)

BenchmarkHunyuan Large VisionKimi K2.5
LMArena Vision11801269
LMArena Document—1430

Multilingual Kimi K2.5 leads

Hunyuan Large Vision: 40.1 (#216), Kimi K2.5: 54.1 (#50)

BenchmarkHunyuan Large VisionKimi K2.5
LMArena Non-English12361433
LMArena Chinese12891495
LMArena Russian12431436
LMArena French—1454
LMArena German—1441
LMArena Japanese—1422
LMArena Korean—1412
LMArena Spanish—1450

Instruction Following Kimi K2.5 leads

Hunyuan Large Vision: 66.0 (#210), Kimi K2.5: 75.5 (#60)

BenchmarkHunyuan Large VisionKimi K2.5
LMArena Instruction Following12501431

Long Context Kimi K2.5 leads

Hunyuan Large Vision: 38.8 (#184), Kimi K2.5: 52.1 (#7)

BenchmarkHunyuan Large VisionKimi K2.5
LMArena Longer Query12791445
Fiction.LiveBench—86.1%
CL-bench—19.3%
CL-bench Life—13.2%

Writing & Preference Kimi K2.5 leads

Hunyuan Large Vision: 46.7 (#211), Kimi K2.5: 65.3 (#51)

BenchmarkHunyuan Large VisionKimi K2.5
LMArena Text12631445
LMArena Creative Writing12501423
LMArena Multi-Turn12531444
EQ-Bench Creative Writing—1579

Frequently asked questions

Is Hunyuan Large Vision better than Kimi K2.5?

Kimi K2.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 47.8 to 37.0 on the Noometry Index.

Is Hunyuan Large Vision or Kimi K2.5 better for coding?

Kimi K2.5 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 48.7 versus 37.6 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Hunyuan Large Vision and Kimi K2.5 share?

13 benchmarks have published results for both models. Hunyuan Large Vision has 13 scored results on Noometry and Kimi K2.5 has 51.

Related comparisons

Go deeper