Model comparison
GLM-4.7 vs Muse Glimmer
GLM-4.7 and Muse Glimmer score almost the same on the Noometry Index (42.0 vs 41.7), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.
Last verified . 15 shared benchmarks.
MetaSummary
- They share 15 benchmarks with published results for both. GLM-4.7 scores higher in 6 categories and Muse Glimmer in 2 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where GLM-4.7 leads 47.0 to 38.5.
Side by side
| GLM-4.7 | Muse Glimmer | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Z.ai (Zhipu) | Meta |
| Noometry Index | 42.0 | 41.7 |
| Released | 2025-12-22 | 2026-08-10 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | 205K | — |
| Max output | 131K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.60 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $2.20 | — |
| Results tracked | 36 | 15 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding GLM-4.7 leads
GLM-4.7: 44.0 (#79), Muse Glimmer: 40.4 (#142)
| Benchmark | GLM-4.7 | Muse Glimmer |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena WebDev | 1435 | 1355 |
| SciCode | 45.1% | 44.9% |
| LMArena Coding | 1454 | 1416 |
| ALE-Bench | 399.48 | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
GLM-4.7: 26.5 (#103), Muse Glimmer: —
| Benchmark | GLM-4.7 | Muse Glimmer |
|---|---|---|
| Terminal-Bench | 33.4% | — |
| Vending-Bench 2 | 2,377 | — |
Reasoning Muse Glimmer leads
GLM-4.7: 24.3 (#164), Muse Glimmer: 25.7 (#144)
| Benchmark | GLM-4.7 | Muse Glimmer |
|---|---|---|
| CritPt | 1.7% | 2.6% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1443 | 1396 |
| SimpleBench | 47.7% | — |
| Chess Puzzles | 6% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 143.51 | — |
Math Too close to call
GLM-4.7: 38.6 (#135), Muse Glimmer: 38.8 (#125)
| Benchmark | GLM-4.7 | Muse Glimmer |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1423 | 1417 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 83.3% | — |
| ProofBench | 6% | — |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | 2.4% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | 0% | — |
Knowledge GLM-4.7 leads
GLM-4.7: 47.0 (#80), Muse Glimmer: 38.5 (#143)
| Benchmark | GLM-4.7 | Muse Glimmer |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1424 | 1386 |
| GPQA Diamond | 83.3% | — |
| SimpleQA Verified | 32.2% | — |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 11.7% | — |
Multilingual GLM-4.7 leads
GLM-4.7: 52.8 (#79), Muse Glimmer: 50.5 (#122)
| Benchmark | GLM-4.7 | Muse Glimmer |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1417 | 1384 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1495 | 1412 |
| LMArena Russian | 1423 | 1390 |
| LMArena French | 1432 | — |
| LMArena German | 1424 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1439 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1399 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1434 | — |
Instruction Following GLM-4.7 leads
GLM-4.7: 74.4 (#95), Muse Glimmer: 72.6 (#135)
| Benchmark | GLM-4.7 | Muse Glimmer |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1411 | 1375 |
Long Context Too close to call
GLM-4.7: 42.8 (#116), Muse Glimmer: 42.1 (#129)
| Benchmark | GLM-4.7 | Muse Glimmer |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1432 | 1382 |
| CL-bench | 15.9% | — |
| CL-bench Life | 10.9% | — |
Writing & Preference GLM-4.7 leads
GLM-4.7: 60.9 (#93), Muse Glimmer: 57.5 (#126)
| Benchmark | GLM-4.7 | Muse Glimmer |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1435 | 1389 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1401 | 1339 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1446 | 1399 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1413 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is GLM-4.7 better than Muse Glimmer?
GLM-4.7 and Muse Glimmer score almost the same on the Noometry Index (42.0 vs 41.7), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.
Is GLM-4.7 or Muse Glimmer better for coding?
GLM-4.7 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 44.0 versus 40.4 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do GLM-4.7 and Muse Glimmer share?
15 benchmarks have published results for both models. GLM-4.7 has 36 scored results on Noometry and Muse Glimmer has 15.