Model comparison
Muse Glimmer vs Qwen3.5 35B-A3B
Muse Glimmer and Qwen3.5 35B-A3B score almost the same on the Noometry Index (41.7 vs 42.0), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.
Last verified . 15 shared benchmarks.
Meta
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- They share 15 benchmarks with published results for both. Muse Glimmer scores higher in 3 categories and Qwen3.5 35B-A3B in 5 categories; 4 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Qwen3.5 35B-A3B leads 47.8 to 38.5.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is SciCode: 44.9% for Muse Glimmer and 29.3% for Qwen3.5 35B-A3B.
Side by side
| Muse Glimmer | Qwen3.5 35B-A3B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Meta | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 41.7 | 42.0 |
| Released | 2026-08-10 | 2026-02-01 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | 262K |
| Max output | — | 66K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.25 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $2 |
| Results tracked | 15 | 28 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Muse Glimmer leads
Muse Glimmer: 40.4 (#142), Qwen3.5 35B-A3B: 33.8 (#251)
| Benchmark | Muse Glimmer | Qwen3.5 35B-A3B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena WebDev | 1355 | 1254 |
| SciCode | 44.9% | 29.3% |
| LMArena Coding | 1416 | 1410 |
Reasoning Muse Glimmer leads
Muse Glimmer: 25.7 (#144), Qwen3.5 35B-A3B: 24.6 (#161)
| Benchmark | Muse Glimmer | Qwen3.5 35B-A3B |
|---|---|---|
| CritPt | 2.6% | 0.6% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1396 | 1400 |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 10% |
| DTBench | — | 80% |
| LMCA | — | 29.5% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 142.52 |
Math Qwen3.5 35B-A3B leads
Muse Glimmer: 38.8 (#125), Qwen3.5 35B-A3B: 39.9 (#97)
| Benchmark | Muse Glimmer | Qwen3.5 35B-A3B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1417 | 1404 |
| MathArena Final-Answer Competitions | — | 56% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 70% |
Knowledge Qwen3.5 35B-A3B leads
Muse Glimmer: 38.5 (#143), Qwen3.5 35B-A3B: 47.8 (#79)
| Benchmark | Muse Glimmer | Qwen3.5 35B-A3B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1386 | 1408 |
| GPQA Diamond | — | 83.5% |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | — | 10.5% |
Multilingual Too close to call
Muse Glimmer: 50.5 (#122), Qwen3.5 35B-A3B: 50.0 (#127)
| Benchmark | Muse Glimmer | Qwen3.5 35B-A3B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1384 | 1378 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1412 | 1457 |
| LMArena Russian | 1390 | 1376 |
| LMArena French | — | 1412 |
| LMArena German | — | 1367 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1325 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1356 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1392 |
Instruction Following Too close to call
Muse Glimmer: 72.6 (#135), Qwen3.5 35B-A3B: 72.8 (#128)
| Benchmark | Muse Glimmer | Qwen3.5 35B-A3B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1375 | 1379 |
Long Context Too close to call
Muse Glimmer: 42.1 (#129), Qwen3.5 35B-A3B: 42.4 (#127)
| Benchmark | Muse Glimmer | Qwen3.5 35B-A3B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1382 | 1389 |
Writing & Preference Too close to call
Muse Glimmer: 57.5 (#126), Qwen3.5 35B-A3B: 57.9 (#124)
| Benchmark | Muse Glimmer | Qwen3.5 35B-A3B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1389 | 1395 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1339 | 1346 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1399 | 1390 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Muse Glimmer better than Qwen3.5 35B-A3B?
Muse Glimmer and Qwen3.5 35B-A3B score almost the same on the Noometry Index (41.7 vs 42.0), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.
Is Muse Glimmer or Qwen3.5 35B-A3B better for coding?
Muse Glimmer scores higher on coding benchmarks: 40.4 versus 33.8 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Muse Glimmer and Qwen3.5 35B-A3B share?
15 benchmarks have published results for both models. Muse Glimmer has 15 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.5 35B-A3B has 28.