Model comparison

GPT-5.4 nano vs Muse Glimmer

GPT-5.4 nano and Muse Glimmer score almost the same on the Noometry Index (41.9 vs 41.3), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

Last verified . 12 shared benchmarks.

GPT-5.4 nano OpenAI

41.9

Rank #111 Confirmed

Muse Glimmer Meta

41.3

Rank #128 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. GPT-5.4 nano scores higher in 3 categories and Muse Glimmer in 5 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in math, where GPT-5.4 nano leads 40.7 to 36.1.
  • Muse Glimmer has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

GPT-5.4 nano and Muse Glimmer specifications
GPT-5.4 nanoMuse Glimmer
ProviderOpenAIMeta
Noometry Index41.941.3
Released2026-03-17—
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window400K—
Max output128K—
Input $ / M tokens$0.20—
Output $ / M tokens$1.25—
Results tracked4013

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding GPT-5.4 nano leads

GPT-5.4 nano: 43.1 (#82), Muse Glimmer: 38.7 (#157)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5.4 nanoMuse Glimmer
LMArena Coding14041417
LMArena WebDev—1355
SciCode46.9%—
WeirdML49.2%—
ALE-Bench1,005—

Reasoning Muse Glimmer leads

GPT-5.4 nano: 23.8 (#159), Muse Glimmer: 27.2 (#111)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5.4 nanoMuse Glimmer
LMArena Hard Prompts13801395
ARC-AGI-25.7%—
Kagi LLM Benchmark39.7%—
ARC-AGI-151.5%—
CritPt9.3%—
Chess Puzzles30%—
Mystery Game Puzzles9%—
DTBench80.3%—
LMCA36.9%—
Epoch Capabilities Index145.78—
ForecastBench57.3—

Math GPT-5.4 nano leads

GPT-5.4 nano: 40.7 (#76), Muse Glimmer: 36.1 (#128)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5.4 nanoMuse Glimmer
LMArena Math14061419
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)44.9%—
FrontierMath Tier 412.2%—
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202587.8%—
ProofBench5%—
FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set)25.9%—
FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1)6.3%—

Knowledge GPT-5.4 nano leads

GPT-5.4 nano: 41.8 (#94), Muse Glimmer: 37.9 (#140)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5.4 nanoMuse Glimmer
LMArena Expert13971388
GPQA Diamond78.5%—
SimpleQA Verified11.7%—
Vectara Hallucination Rate3.1%—

Multimodal Not comparable

GPT-5.4 nano: 36.0 (#73), Muse Glimmer: —

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5.4 nanoMuse Glimmer
LMArena Vision1196—

Multilingual Muse Glimmer leads

GPT-5.4 nano: 48.8 (#136), Muse Glimmer: 50.6 (#117)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5.4 nanoMuse Glimmer
LMArena Non-English13591384
LMArena Chinese13911412
LMArena Russian13631393
LMArena French1396—
LMArena German1368—
LMArena Japanese1342—
LMArena Korean1321—
LMArena Spanish1368—

Instruction Following Too close to call

GPT-5.4 nano: 72.1 (#139), Muse Glimmer: 72.7 (#134)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5.4 nanoMuse Glimmer
LMArena Instruction Following13621374

Long Context Too close to call

GPT-5.4 nano: 41.6 (#131), Muse Glimmer: 42.1 (#124)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5.4 nanoMuse Glimmer
LMArena Longer Query13651381

Writing & Preference Muse Glimmer leads

GPT-5.4 nano: 55.9 (#137), Muse Glimmer: 57.7 (#122)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5.4 nanoMuse Glimmer
LMArena Text13721389
LMArena Creative Writing13131338
LMArena Multi-Turn13821398

Frequently asked questions

Is GPT-5.4 nano better than Muse Glimmer?

GPT-5.4 nano and Muse Glimmer score almost the same on the Noometry Index (41.9 vs 41.3), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

Is GPT-5.4 nano or Muse Glimmer better for coding?

GPT-5.4 nano scores higher on coding benchmarks: 43.1 versus 38.7 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do GPT-5.4 nano and Muse Glimmer share?

12 benchmarks have published results for both models. GPT-5.4 nano has 40 scored results on Noometry and Muse Glimmer has 13.

Related comparisons

Go deeper