Model comparison
GLM-4.7-Flash vs Nova 2.0 Pro Preview
GLM-4.7-Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.8 to 33.4 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Summary
- GLM-4.7-Flash has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| GLM-4.7-Flash | Nova 2.0 Pro Preview | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Z.ai (Zhipu) | Amazon |
| Noometry Index | 38.8 | 33.4 |
| Released | 2026-01-19 | 2025-12-02 |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |
| Context window | 200K | — |
| Max output | 131K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.06 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $0.40 | — |
| Results tracked | 21 | 3 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Too close to call
GLM-4.7-Flash: 40.6 (#135), Nova 2.0 Pro Preview: 40.8 (#133)
| Benchmark | GLM-4.7-Flash | Nova 2.0 Pro Preview |
|---|---|---|
| SciCode | — | 42.7% |
| LMArena Coding | 1383 | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
GLM-4.7-Flash: —, Nova 2.0 Pro Preview: 21.9 (#136)
| Benchmark | GLM-4.7-Flash | Nova 2.0 Pro Preview |
|---|---|---|
| GDP.pdf | — | 2% |
Reasoning Nova 2.0 Pro Preview leads
GLM-4.7-Flash: 20.9 (#229), Nova 2.0 Pro Preview: 22.4 (#194)
| Benchmark | GLM-4.7-Flash | Nova 2.0 Pro Preview |
|---|---|---|
| CritPt | — | 0% |
| Chess Puzzles | 0% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1356 | — |
Math Not comparable
GLM-4.7-Flash: 36.1 (#173), Nova 2.0 Pro Preview: —
| Benchmark | GLM-4.7-Flash | Nova 2.0 Pro Preview |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 58.3% | — |
| LMArena Math | 1355 | — |
Knowledge Not comparable
GLM-4.7-Flash: 35.5 (#184), Nova 2.0 Pro Preview: —
| Benchmark | GLM-4.7-Flash | Nova 2.0 Pro Preview |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 60.5% | — |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 9.3% | — |
| LMArena Expert | 1357 | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
GLM-4.7-Flash: 46.5 (#158), Nova 2.0 Pro Preview: —
| Benchmark | GLM-4.7-Flash | Nova 2.0 Pro Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1330 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1403 | — |
| LMArena French | 1332 | — |
| LMArena German | 1337 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1283 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1332 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1350 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
GLM-4.7-Flash: 70.1 (#167), Nova 2.0 Pro Preview: —
| Benchmark | GLM-4.7-Flash | Nova 2.0 Pro Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1327 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
GLM-4.7-Flash: 40.9 (#148), Nova 2.0 Pro Preview: —
| Benchmark | GLM-4.7-Flash | Nova 2.0 Pro Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1345 | — |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
GLM-4.7-Flash: 47.4 (#210), Nova 2.0 Pro Preview: —
| Benchmark | GLM-4.7-Flash | Nova 2.0 Pro Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1351 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1297 | — |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1125 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1342 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is GLM-4.7-Flash better than Nova 2.0 Pro Preview?
GLM-4.7-Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.8 to 33.4 on the Noometry Index.
Is GLM-4.7-Flash or Nova 2.0 Pro Preview better for coding?
They score almost the same on coding (40.6 vs 40.8); test both on your own repository before choosing.
How many benchmarks do GLM-4.7-Flash and Nova 2.0 Pro Preview share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. GLM-4.7-Flash has 21 scored results on Noometry and Nova 2.0 Pro Preview has 3.