Model comparison
Nova 2.0 Pro Preview vs Qwen2.5 Plus 1127
Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.8 to 33.4 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 leads 25.9 to 22.4.
Side by side
| Nova 2.0 Pro Preview | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Amazon | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 33.4 | 38.8 |
| Released | 2025-12-02 | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 3 | 14 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Nova 2.0 Pro Preview leads
Nova 2.0 Pro Preview: 40.8 (#133), Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 38.5 (#175)
| Benchmark | Nova 2.0 Pro Preview | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| SciCode | 42.7% | — |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1314 |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Nova 2.0 Pro Preview: 21.9 (#136), Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: —
| Benchmark | Nova 2.0 Pro Preview | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| GDP.pdf | 2% | — |
Reasoning Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 leads
Nova 2.0 Pro Preview: 22.4 (#194), Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 25.9 (#141)
| Benchmark | Nova 2.0 Pro Preview | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| CritPt | 0% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1299 |
Math Not comparable
Nova 2.0 Pro Preview: —, Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 36.1 (#174)
| Benchmark | Nova 2.0 Pro Preview | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | — | 1298 |
Knowledge Not comparable
Nova 2.0 Pro Preview: —, Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 35.5 (#183)
| Benchmark | Nova 2.0 Pro Preview | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | — | 1289 |
Multilingual Not comparable
Nova 2.0 Pro Preview: —, Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 41.9 (#201)
| Benchmark | Nova 2.0 Pro Preview | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1265 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1314 |
| LMArena German | — | 1231 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1207 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1271 |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Nova 2.0 Pro Preview: —, Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 67.2 (#199)
| Benchmark | Nova 2.0 Pro Preview | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1275 |
Long Context Not comparable
Nova 2.0 Pro Preview: —, Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 39.2 (#184)
| Benchmark | Nova 2.0 Pro Preview | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1292 |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Nova 2.0 Pro Preview: —, Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 49.4 (#192)
| Benchmark | Nova 2.0 Pro Preview | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1299 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1262 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1299 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Nova 2.0 Pro Preview better than Qwen2.5 Plus 1127?
Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.8 to 33.4 on the Noometry Index.
Is Nova 2.0 Pro Preview or Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 better for coding?
Nova 2.0 Pro Preview scores higher on coding benchmarks: 40.8 versus 38.5 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Nova 2.0 Pro Preview and Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Nova 2.0 Pro Preview has 3 scored results on Noometry and Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 has 14.