Model comparison
GLM-4.7-Flash vs Molmo 2 8b
GLM-4.7-Flash and Molmo 2 8b score almost the same on the Noometry Index (38.8 vs 39.1), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.
Last verified . 4 shared benchmarks.
Allen Institute for AI (Ai2)Summary
- They share 4 benchmarks with published results for both. GLM-4.7-Flash scores higher in 2 categories and Molmo 2 8b in 2 categories; 4 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where Molmo 2 8b leads 25.6 to 20.9.
Side by side
| GLM-4.7-Flash | Molmo 2 8b | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Z.ai (Zhipu) | Allen Institute for AI (Ai2) |
| Noometry Index | 38.8 | 39.1 |
| Released | 2026-01-19 | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | 200K | — |
| Max output | 131K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.06 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $0.40 | — |
| Results tracked | 21 | 5 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
GLM-4.7-Flash: 40.6 (#135), Molmo 2 8b: —
| Benchmark | GLM-4.7-Flash | Molmo 2 8b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1383 | — |
Reasoning Molmo 2 8b leads
GLM-4.7-Flash: 20.9 (#229), Molmo 2 8b: 25.6 (#146)
| Benchmark | GLM-4.7-Flash | Molmo 2 8b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1356 | 1287 |
| Chess Puzzles | 0% | — |
Math Not comparable
GLM-4.7-Flash: 36.1 (#173), Molmo 2 8b: —
| Benchmark | GLM-4.7-Flash | Molmo 2 8b |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 58.3% | — |
| LMArena Math | 1355 | — |
Knowledge Not comparable
GLM-4.7-Flash: 35.5 (#184), Molmo 2 8b: —
| Benchmark | GLM-4.7-Flash | Molmo 2 8b |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 60.5% | — |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 9.3% | — |
| LMArena Expert | 1357 | — |
Multimodal Not comparable
GLM-4.7-Flash: —, Molmo 2 8b: 30.2 (#112)
| Benchmark | GLM-4.7-Flash | Molmo 2 8b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1081 |
Multilingual GLM-4.7-Flash leads
GLM-4.7-Flash: 46.5 (#158), Molmo 2 8b: 42.7 (#190)
| Benchmark | GLM-4.7-Flash | Molmo 2 8b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1330 | 1276 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1403 | — |
| LMArena French | 1332 | — |
| LMArena German | 1337 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1283 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1332 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1350 | — |
Instruction Following GLM-4.7-Flash leads
GLM-4.7-Flash: 70.1 (#167), Molmo 2 8b: 67.0 (#201)
| Benchmark | GLM-4.7-Flash | Molmo 2 8b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1327 | 1270 |
Long Context Not comparable
GLM-4.7-Flash: 40.9 (#148), Molmo 2 8b: —
| Benchmark | GLM-4.7-Flash | Molmo 2 8b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1345 | — |
Writing & Preference Molmo 2 8b leads
GLM-4.7-Flash: 47.4 (#210), Molmo 2 8b: 49.4 (#191)
| Benchmark | GLM-4.7-Flash | Molmo 2 8b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1351 | 1288 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1297 | — |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1125 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1342 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is GLM-4.7-Flash better than Molmo 2 8b?
GLM-4.7-Flash and Molmo 2 8b score almost the same on the Noometry Index (38.8 vs 39.1), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.
How many benchmarks do GLM-4.7-Flash and Molmo 2 8b share?
4 benchmarks have published results for both models. GLM-4.7-Flash has 21 scored results on Noometry and Molmo 2 8b has 5.