Model comparison
GLM-4.7-Flash vs Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo
Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.8 to 38.8 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 19 shared benchmarks.
Summary
- They share 19 benchmarks with published results for both. GLM-4.7-Flash scores higher in 1 category and Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo in 7 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo leads 50.9 to 35.5.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025: 58.3% for GLM-4.7-Flash and 83.1% for Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo.
Side by side
| GLM-4.7-Flash | Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Z.ai (Zhipu) | Moonshot AI |
| Noometry Index | 38.8 | 45.8 |
| Released | 2026-01-19 | 2025-11-06 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | 200K | — |
| Max output | 131K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.06 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $0.40 | — |
| Results tracked | 21 | 21 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding GLM-4.7-Flash leads
GLM-4.7-Flash: 40.6 (#135), Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo: 38.4 (#178)
| Benchmark | GLM-4.7-Flash | Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1383 | 1454 |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1322 |
Reasoning Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo leads
GLM-4.7-Flash: 20.9 (#229), Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo: 32.5 (#75)
| Benchmark | GLM-4.7-Flash | Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| Chess Puzzles | 0% | 20% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1356 | 1428 |
Math Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo leads
GLM-4.7-Flash: 36.1 (#173), Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo: 47.4 (#68)
| Benchmark | GLM-4.7-Flash | Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 58.3% | 83.1% |
| LMArena Math | 1355 | 1429 |
Knowledge Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo leads
GLM-4.7-Flash: 35.5 (#184), Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo: 50.9 (#69)
| Benchmark | GLM-4.7-Flash | Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 60.5% | 84.2% |
| LMArena Expert | 1357 | 1439 |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 9.3% | — |
Multilingual Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo leads
GLM-4.7-Flash: 46.5 (#158), Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo: 51.4 (#109)
| Benchmark | GLM-4.7-Flash | Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1330 | 1398 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1403 | 1456 |
| LMArena French | 1332 | 1425 |
| LMArena German | 1337 | 1390 |
| LMArena Korean | 1283 | 1330 |
| LMArena Russian | 1332 | 1391 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1350 | 1406 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1357 |
Instruction Following Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo leads
GLM-4.7-Flash: 70.1 (#167), Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo: 74.0 (#109)
| Benchmark | GLM-4.7-Flash | Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1327 | 1403 |
Long Context Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo leads
GLM-4.7-Flash: 40.9 (#148), Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo: 43.2 (#102)
| Benchmark | GLM-4.7-Flash | Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1345 | 1415 |
Writing & Preference Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo leads
GLM-4.7-Flash: 47.4 (#210), Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo: 60.0 (#104)
| Benchmark | GLM-4.7-Flash | Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1351 | 1415 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1297 | 1374 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1342 | 1414 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1125 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is GLM-4.7-Flash better than Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo?
Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.8 to 38.8 on the Noometry Index.
Is GLM-4.7-Flash or Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo better for coding?
GLM-4.7-Flash scores higher on coding benchmarks: 40.6 versus 38.4 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do GLM-4.7-Flash and Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo share?
19 benchmarks have published results for both models. GLM-4.7-Flash has 21 scored results on Noometry and Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo has 21.