Model comparison
GLM-4.5V vs MiniMax-M3
MiniMax-M3 is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.8 to 39.8 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 14 shared benchmarks.
MiniMaxSummary
- They share 14 benchmarks with published results for both. GLM-4.5V scores higher in 0 categories and MiniMax-M3 in 9 categories; 9 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where MiniMax-M3 leads 58.4 to 37.5.
- MiniMax-M3 is cheaper at $0.30 / $1.20 per million input/output tokens, against $0.60 / $1.80 for GLM-4.5V.
- MiniMax-M3 accepts more context: 1M tokens versus 64K.
Side by side
| GLM-4.5V | MiniMax-M3 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Z.ai (Zhipu) | MiniMax |
| Noometry Index | 39.8 | 43.8 |
| Released | 2025-08-11 | 2026-06-01 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | 64K | 1M |
| Max output | 16K | 512K |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.60 | $0.30 |
| Output $ / M tokens | $1.80 | $1.20 |
| Results tracked | 15 | 41 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding MiniMax-M3 leads
GLM-4.5V: 39.5 (#155), MiniMax-M3: 41.8 (#118)
| Benchmark | GLM-4.5V | MiniMax-M3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1347 | 1469 |
| FrontierCode | — | 14.7% |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1482 |
| SciCode | — | 47.1% |
| ALE-Bench | — | 640.02 |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
GLM-4.5V: —, MiniMax-M3: 22.6 (#130)
| Benchmark | GLM-4.5V | MiniMax-M3 |
|---|---|---|
| APEX-Agents | — | 37.7% |
| OSWorld 2.0 | — | 4.6% |
| GBAEval | — | 0.9% |
| Vending-Bench 2 | — | 2,158 |
Reasoning MiniMax-M3 leads
GLM-4.5V: 27.4 (#119), MiniMax-M3: 30.1 (#87)
| Benchmark | GLM-4.5V | MiniMax-M3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1334 | 1447 |
| SimpleBench | — | 45.8% |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 59.8% | — |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 65.1% |
| CritPt | — | 3.7% |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 14% |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | — | 8% |
| DTBench | — | 78.9% |
| LMCA | — | 33.7% |
| Surface Evolver Bench | — | 55% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 146.95 |
| ForecastBench | — | 61.4 |
Math MiniMax-M3 leads
GLM-4.5V: 37.4 (#159), MiniMax-M3: 40.0 (#95)
| Benchmark | GLM-4.5V | MiniMax-M3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1354 | 1429 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 71.1% |
| ProofBench | — | 18% |
Knowledge MiniMax-M3 leads
GLM-4.5V: 37.5 (#156), MiniMax-M3: 58.4 (#35)
| Benchmark | GLM-4.5V | MiniMax-M3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1353 | 1461 |
| GPQA Diamond | — | 90.9% |
Multimodal MiniMax-M3 leads
GLM-4.5V: 34.3 (#92), MiniMax-M3: 40.2 (#51)
| Benchmark | GLM-4.5V | MiniMax-M3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1154 | 1253 |
| LMArena Document | — | 1435 |
Multilingual MiniMax-M3 leads
GLM-4.5V: 44.6 (#177), MiniMax-M3: 53.0 (#75)
| Benchmark | GLM-4.5V | MiniMax-M3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1303 | 1420 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1337 | 1463 |
| LMArena Russian | 1298 | 1428 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1336 | 1432 |
| LMArena French | — | 1447 |
| LMArena German | — | 1426 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1381 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1372 |
Instruction Following MiniMax-M3 leads
GLM-4.5V: 69.2 (#175), MiniMax-M3: 75.5 (#62)
| Benchmark | GLM-4.5V | MiniMax-M3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1311 | 1433 |
Long Context MiniMax-M3 leads
GLM-4.5V: 39.6 (#171), MiniMax-M3: 44.2 (#72)
| Benchmark | GLM-4.5V | MiniMax-M3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1304 | 1445 |
Writing & Preference MiniMax-M3 leads
GLM-4.5V: 52.5 (#170), MiniMax-M3: 62.1 (#83)
| Benchmark | GLM-4.5V | MiniMax-M3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1333 | 1433 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1295 | 1404 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1332 | 1442 |
| EQ-Bench 4 | — | 1150 |
Frequently asked questions
Is GLM-4.5V better than MiniMax-M3?
MiniMax-M3 is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.8 to 39.8 on the Noometry Index.
Which is cheaper, GLM-4.5V or MiniMax-M3?
MiniMax-M3 is cheaper. It lists at $0.30 per million input tokens and $1.20 per million output tokens; GLM-4.5V lists at $0.60 and $1.80.
Is GLM-4.5V or MiniMax-M3 better for coding?
MiniMax-M3 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 41.8 versus 39.5 in the Noometry coding category.
Which has the bigger context window?
MiniMax-M3 does, with 1M tokens against 64K.
How many benchmarks do GLM-4.5V and MiniMax-M3 share?
14 benchmarks have published results for both models. GLM-4.5V has 15 scored results on Noometry and MiniMax-M3 has 41.