Model comparison
ERNIE 5.1 vs GLM-4.5V
ERNIE 5.1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.8 to 39.8 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 13 shared benchmarks.
BaiduSummary
- They share 13 benchmarks with published results for both. ERNIE 5.1 scores higher in 7 categories and GLM-4.5V in 1 category; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where ERNIE 5.1 leads 65.1 to 52.5.
- GLM-4.5V has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| ERNIE 5.1 | GLM-4.5V | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Baidu | Z.ai (Zhipu) |
| Noometry Index | 43.8 | 39.8 |
| Released | — | 2025-08-11 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | — | 64K |
| Max output | — | 16K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.60 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $1.80 |
| Results tracked | 19 | 15 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding ERNIE 5.1 leads
ERNIE 5.1: 44.0 (#76), GLM-4.5V: 39.5 (#155)
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.1 | GLM-4.5V |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1488 | 1347 |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
ERNIE 5.1: —, GLM-4.5V: —
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.1 | GLM-4.5V |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Search | 1227 | — |
Reasoning GLM-4.5V leads
ERNIE 5.1: 21.9 (#211), GLM-4.5V: 27.4 (#119)
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.1 | GLM-4.5V |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1481 | 1334 |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 59.8% |
| NYT Connections (extended) | 23.4% | — |
Math ERNIE 5.1 leads
ERNIE 5.1: 40.3 (#92), GLM-4.5V: 37.4 (#159)
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.1 | GLM-4.5V |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1481 | 1354 |
Knowledge ERNIE 5.1 leads
ERNIE 5.1: 41.9 (#102), GLM-4.5V: 37.5 (#156)
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.1 | GLM-4.5V |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1492 | 1353 |
Multimodal Not comparable
ERNIE 5.1: —, GLM-4.5V: 34.3 (#92)
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.1 | GLM-4.5V |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1154 |
Multilingual ERNIE 5.1 leads
ERNIE 5.1: 55.5 (#29), GLM-4.5V: 44.6 (#177)
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.1 | GLM-4.5V |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1454 | 1303 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1508 | 1337 |
| LMArena Russian | 1459 | 1298 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1473 | 1336 |
| LMArena French | 1488 | — |
| LMArena German | 1470 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1422 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1427 | — |
Instruction Following ERNIE 5.1 leads
ERNIE 5.1: 76.7 (#37), GLM-4.5V: 69.2 (#175)
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.1 | GLM-4.5V |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1460 | 1311 |
Long Context ERNIE 5.1 leads
ERNIE 5.1: 44.7 (#59), GLM-4.5V: 39.6 (#171)
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.1 | GLM-4.5V |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1462 | 1304 |
Writing & Preference ERNIE 5.1 leads
ERNIE 5.1: 65.1 (#52), GLM-4.5V: 52.5 (#170)
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.1 | GLM-4.5V |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1468 | 1333 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1441 | 1295 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1471 | 1332 |
Frequently asked questions
Is ERNIE 5.1 better than GLM-4.5V?
ERNIE 5.1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.8 to 39.8 on the Noometry Index.
Is ERNIE 5.1 or GLM-4.5V better for coding?
ERNIE 5.1 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 44.0 versus 39.5 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do ERNIE 5.1 and GLM-4.5V share?
13 benchmarks have published results for both models. ERNIE 5.1 has 19 scored results on Noometry and GLM-4.5V has 15.