Model comparison

GLM-4.5 vs Nemotron 3 Super

GLM-4.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.0 to 40.1 on the Noometry Index. Nemotron 3 Super costs 5.8× less per token, which makes it the better buy when GLM-4.5's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

Last verified . 17 shared benchmarks.

GLM-4.5 Z.ai (Zhipu)

42.0

Rank #122 Confirmed

Nemotron 3 Super NVIDIA

40.1

Rank #153 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. GLM-4.5 scores higher in 5 categories and Nemotron 3 Super in 3 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in reasoning, where GLM-4.5 leads 28.6 to 18.7.
  • Nemotron 3 Super is cheaper at $0.08 / $0.45 per million input/output tokens, against $0.60 / $2.20 for GLM-4.5.
  • Nemotron 3 Super accepts more context: 262K tokens versus 131K.

Side by side

GLM-4.5 and Nemotron 3 Super specifications
GLM-4.5Nemotron 3 Super
ProviderZ.ai (Zhipu)NVIDIA
Noometry Index42.040.1
Released2025-07-272026-03-11
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window131K262K
Max output98K131K
Input $ / M tokens$0.60$0.08
Output $ / M tokens$2.20$0.45
Results tracked2721

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding GLM-4.5 leads

GLM-4.5: 41.4 (#125), Nemotron 3 Super: 39.4 (#158)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-4.5Nemotron 3 Super
WeirdML40.6%38%
LMArena Coding14341403
ALE-Bench344.82213.9
SWE-bench Verified (bash only)54.2%—
SciCode—36%
AlgoTune1.52—

Reasoning GLM-4.5 leads

GLM-4.5: 28.6 (#100), Nemotron 3 Super: 18.7 (#276)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-4.5Nemotron 3 Super
LMArena Hard Prompts14291386
Kagi LLM Benchmark57.9%—
NYT Connections (extended)—15.4%
CritPt—3.1%

Math Too close to call

GLM-4.5: 39.0 (#116), Nemotron 3 Super: 39.6 (#101)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-4.5Nemotron 3 Super
LMArena Math14271380
MathArena Final-Answer Competitions—60.4%

Knowledge Nemotron 3 Super leads

GLM-4.5: 35.9 (#179), Nemotron 3 Super: 38.9 (#139)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-4.5Nemotron 3 Super
LMArena Expert14331398
Humanity's Last Exam8.3%—
Confabulations11.3%—

Multilingual GLM-4.5 leads

GLM-4.5: 52.8 (#77), Nemotron 3 Super: 48.4 (#144)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-4.5Nemotron 3 Super
LMArena Non-English14171355
LMArena Chinese14651432
LMArena French14181405
LMArena German14071341
LMArena Russian14141336
LMArena Spanish14541417
LMArena Japanese1415—
LMArena Korean1380—

Instruction Following GLM-4.5 leads

GLM-4.5: 74.1 (#104), Nemotron 3 Super: 71.2 (#154)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-4.5Nemotron 3 Super
LMArena Instruction Following14041347

Long Context Nemotron 3 Super leads

GLM-4.5: 38.2 (#201), Nemotron 3 Super: 41.5 (#139)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-4.5Nemotron 3 Super
LMArena Longer Query14121362
Fiction.LiveBench58.3%—

Writing & Preference GLM-4.5 leads

GLM-4.5: 57.5 (#127), Nemotron 3 Super: 55.9 (#140)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-4.5Nemotron 3 Super
LMArena Text14301378
LMArena Creative Writing13951317
LMArena Multi-Turn14151369
Short-Story Creative Writing73.4%—
EQ-Bench Creative Writing1343—

Frequently asked questions

Is GLM-4.5 better than Nemotron 3 Super?

GLM-4.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.0 to 40.1 on the Noometry Index. Nemotron 3 Super costs 5.8× less per token, which makes it the better buy when GLM-4.5's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

Which is cheaper, GLM-4.5 or Nemotron 3 Super?

Nemotron 3 Super is cheaper. It lists at $0.08 per million input tokens and $0.45 per million output tokens; GLM-4.5 lists at $0.60 and $2.20.

Is GLM-4.5 or Nemotron 3 Super better for coding?

GLM-4.5 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 41.4 versus 39.4 in the Noometry coding category.

Which has the bigger context window?

Nemotron 3 Super does, with 262K tokens against 131K.

How many benchmarks do GLM-4.5 and Nemotron 3 Super share?

17 benchmarks have published results for both models. GLM-4.5 has 27 scored results on Noometry and Nemotron 3 Super has 21.

Related comparisons

Go deeper