Model comparison

GLM-4.5-Air vs Nemotron 4 340b Instruct

GLM-4.5-Air is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.9 to 35.9 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 17 shared benchmarks.

GLM-4.5-Air Z.ai (Zhipu)

38.9

Rank #177 Confirmed

Nemotron 4 340b Instruct NVIDIA

35.9

Rank #223 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. GLM-4.5-Air scores higher in 7 categories and Nemotron 4 340b Instruct in 1 category; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where GLM-4.5-Air leads 55.9 to 42.7.

Side by side

GLM-4.5-Air and Nemotron 4 340b Instruct specifications
GLM-4.5-AirNemotron 4 340b Instruct
ProviderZ.ai (Zhipu)NVIDIA
Noometry Index38.935.9
Released2025-07-202024-06-14
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window131K—
Max output98K—
Input $ / M tokens$0.20—
Output $ / M tokens$1.10—
Results tracked2717

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Nemotron 4 340b Instruct leads

GLM-4.5-Air: 33.3 (#259), Nemotron 4 340b Instruct: 35.2 (#228)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-4.5-AirNemotron 4 340b Instruct
LMArena Coding13971209
GSO2.9%—

Reasoning Too close to call

GLM-4.5-Air: 24.1 (#166), Nemotron 4 340b Instruct: 23.4 (#178)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-4.5-AirNemotron 4 340b Instruct
LMArena Hard Prompts13791202
Kagi LLM Benchmark43%—
ForecastBench59.2—

Math GLM-4.5-Air leads

GLM-4.5-Air: 36.2 (#170), Nemotron 4 340b Instruct: 34.3 (#195)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-4.5-AirNemotron 4 340b Instruct
LMArena Math13961216
Omni-MATH39.1%—

Knowledge GLM-4.5-Air leads

GLM-4.5-Air: 35.0 (#191), Nemotron 4 340b Instruct: 32.0 (#216)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-4.5-AirNemotron 4 340b Instruct
LMArena Expert13701171
Humanity's Last Exam8.1%—
MMLU-Pro76.2%—
Vectara Hallucination Rate9.3%—
GPQA (HELM)59.4%—

Multilingual GLM-4.5-Air leads

GLM-4.5-Air: 49.1 (#135), Nemotron 4 340b Instruct: 37.9 (#233)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-4.5-AirNemotron 4 340b Instruct
LMArena Non-English13661206
LMArena Chinese14261214
LMArena French13991197
LMArena German13771192
LMArena Japanese13481128
LMArena Korean13081148
LMArena Russian13731219
LMArena Spanish13861195

Instruction Following GLM-4.5-Air leads

GLM-4.5-Air: 69.6 (#171), Nemotron 4 340b Instruct: 63.1 (#232)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-4.5-AirNemotron 4 340b Instruct
LMArena Instruction Following13541203
IFEval81.2%—

Long Context GLM-4.5-Air leads

GLM-4.5-Air: 41.6 (#135), Nemotron 4 340b Instruct: 37.1 (#221)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-4.5-AirNemotron 4 340b Instruct
LMArena Longer Query13661225

Writing & Preference GLM-4.5-Air leads

GLM-4.5-Air: 55.9 (#139), Nemotron 4 340b Instruct: 42.7 (#233)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-4.5-AirNemotron 4 340b Instruct
LMArena Text13841225
LMArena Creative Writing13431203
LMArena Multi-Turn13711214
WildBench78.9%—

Frequently asked questions

Is GLM-4.5-Air better than Nemotron 4 340b Instruct?

GLM-4.5-Air is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.9 to 35.9 on the Noometry Index.

Is GLM-4.5-Air or Nemotron 4 340b Instruct better for coding?

Nemotron 4 340b Instruct scores higher on coding benchmarks: 35.2 versus 33.3 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do GLM-4.5-Air and Nemotron 4 340b Instruct share?

17 benchmarks have published results for both models. GLM-4.5-Air has 27 scored results on Noometry and Nemotron 4 340b Instruct has 17.

Related comparisons

Go deeper