Model comparison

MiniMax-M2.1 vs Nemotron 4 340b Instruct

MiniMax-M2.1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.9 to 35.9 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 17 shared benchmarks.

MiniMax-M2.1 MiniMax

38.9

Rank #178 Confirmed

Nemotron 4 340b Instruct NVIDIA

35.9

Rank #223 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. MiniMax-M2.1 scores higher in 7 categories and Nemotron 4 340b Instruct in 1 category; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where MiniMax-M2.1 leads 58.3 to 42.7.

Side by side

MiniMax-M2.1 and Nemotron 4 340b Instruct specifications
MiniMax-M2.1Nemotron 4 340b Instruct
ProviderMiniMaxNVIDIA
Noometry Index38.935.9
Released2025-12-232024-06-14
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window205K—
Max output131K—
Input $ / M tokens$0.30—
Output $ / M tokens$1.20—
Results tracked2217

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding MiniMax-M2.1 leads

MiniMax-M2.1: 40.4 (#143), Nemotron 4 340b Instruct: 35.2 (#228)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkMiniMax-M2.1Nemotron 4 340b Instruct
LMArena Coding14211209
LMArena WebDev1384—
ALE-Bench623.83—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

MiniMax-M2.1: 27.9 (#98), Nemotron 4 340b Instruct: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkMiniMax-M2.1Nemotron 4 340b Instruct
Terminal-Bench36.6%—

Reasoning Nemotron 4 340b Instruct leads

MiniMax-M2.1: 16.6 (#302), Nemotron 4 340b Instruct: 23.4 (#178)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkMiniMax-M2.1Nemotron 4 340b Instruct
LMArena Hard Prompts14111202
NYT Connections (extended)11.2%—

Math MiniMax-M2.1 leads

MiniMax-M2.1: 38.3 (#138), Nemotron 4 340b Instruct: 34.3 (#195)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkMiniMax-M2.1Nemotron 4 340b Instruct
LMArena Math13971216

Knowledge MiniMax-M2.1 leads

MiniMax-M2.1: 38.3 (#147), Nemotron 4 340b Instruct: 32.0 (#216)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkMiniMax-M2.1Nemotron 4 340b Instruct
LMArena Expert14311171
Vectara Hallucination Rate11.8%—

Multilingual MiniMax-M2.1 leads

MiniMax-M2.1: 50.0 (#128), Nemotron 4 340b Instruct: 37.9 (#233)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkMiniMax-M2.1Nemotron 4 340b Instruct
LMArena Non-English13781206
LMArena Chinese14301214
LMArena French14041197
LMArena German13811192
LMArena Japanese12871128
LMArena Korean12981148
LMArena Russian13871219
LMArena Spanish13971195

Instruction Following MiniMax-M2.1 leads

MiniMax-M2.1: 73.8 (#112), Nemotron 4 340b Instruct: 63.1 (#232)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkMiniMax-M2.1Nemotron 4 340b Instruct
LMArena Instruction Following14001203

Long Context MiniMax-M2.1 leads

MiniMax-M2.1: 43.2 (#101), Nemotron 4 340b Instruct: 37.1 (#221)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkMiniMax-M2.1Nemotron 4 340b Instruct
LMArena Longer Query14161225

Writing & Preference MiniMax-M2.1 leads

MiniMax-M2.1: 58.3 (#120), Nemotron 4 340b Instruct: 42.7 (#233)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkMiniMax-M2.1Nemotron 4 340b Instruct
LMArena Text13921225
LMArena Creative Writing13611203
LMArena Multi-Turn13961214

Frequently asked questions

Is MiniMax-M2.1 better than Nemotron 4 340b Instruct?

MiniMax-M2.1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.9 to 35.9 on the Noometry Index.

Is MiniMax-M2.1 or Nemotron 4 340b Instruct better for coding?

MiniMax-M2.1 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 40.4 versus 35.2 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do MiniMax-M2.1 and Nemotron 4 340b Instruct share?

17 benchmarks have published results for both models. MiniMax-M2.1 has 22 scored results on Noometry and Nemotron 4 340b Instruct has 17.

Related comparisons

Go deeper