Model comparison

Mercury 2 vs Nemotron 4 340b Instruct

Mercury 2 is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.1 to 35.9 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 11 shared benchmarks.

Mercury 2 Inception

39.1

Rank #175 Confirmed

Nemotron 4 340b Instruct NVIDIA

35.9

Rank #223 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 11 benchmarks with published results for both. Mercury 2 scores higher in 6 categories and Nemotron 4 340b Instruct in 1 category; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Mercury 2 leads 53.8 to 42.7.
  • Nemotron 4 340b Instruct has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Mercury 2 and Nemotron 4 340b Instruct specifications
Mercury 2Nemotron 4 340b Instruct
ProviderInceptionNVIDIA
Noometry Index39.135.9
Released2026-02-202024-06-14
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window128K—
Max output50K—
Input $ / M tokens$0.25—
Output $ / M tokens$0.75—
Results tracked1717

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Nemotron 4 340b Instruct leads

Mercury 2: 33.5 (#255), Nemotron 4 340b Instruct: 35.2 (#228)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkMercury 2Nemotron 4 340b Instruct
LMArena Coding13911209
LMArena WebDev1171—
SciCode38.7%—
WeirdML43.2%—
ALE-Bench785.58—

Reasoning Too close to call

Mercury 2: 23.8 (#170), Nemotron 4 340b Instruct: 23.4 (#178)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkMercury 2Nemotron 4 340b Instruct
LMArena Hard Prompts13621202
CritPt0.8%—

Math Not comparable

Mercury 2: —, Nemotron 4 340b Instruct: 34.3 (#195)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkMercury 2Nemotron 4 340b Instruct
LMArena Math—1216

Knowledge Mercury 2 leads

Mercury 2: 36.2 (#172), Nemotron 4 340b Instruct: 32.0 (#216)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkMercury 2Nemotron 4 340b Instruct
LMArena Expert13581171
Vectara Hallucination Rate12.3%—

Multilingual Mercury 2 leads

Mercury 2: 46.6 (#157), Nemotron 4 340b Instruct: 37.9 (#233)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkMercury 2Nemotron 4 340b Instruct
LMArena Non-English13311206
LMArena Chinese14171214
LMArena Russian13041219
LMArena French—1197
LMArena German—1192
LMArena Japanese—1128
LMArena Korean—1148
LMArena Spanish—1195

Instruction Following Mercury 2 leads

Mercury 2: 70.2 (#165), Nemotron 4 340b Instruct: 63.1 (#232)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkMercury 2Nemotron 4 340b Instruct
LMArena Instruction Following13291203

Long Context Mercury 2 leads

Mercury 2: 40.5 (#154), Nemotron 4 340b Instruct: 37.1 (#221)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkMercury 2Nemotron 4 340b Instruct
LMArena Longer Query13301225

Writing & Preference Mercury 2 leads

Mercury 2: 53.8 (#155), Nemotron 4 340b Instruct: 42.7 (#233)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkMercury 2Nemotron 4 340b Instruct
LMArena Text13551225
LMArena Creative Writing12891203
LMArena Multi-Turn13581214

Frequently asked questions

Is Mercury 2 better than Nemotron 4 340b Instruct?

Mercury 2 is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.1 to 35.9 on the Noometry Index.

Is Mercury 2 or Nemotron 4 340b Instruct better for coding?

Nemotron 4 340b Instruct scores higher on coding benchmarks: 35.2 versus 33.5 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Mercury 2 and Nemotron 4 340b Instruct share?

11 benchmarks have published results for both models. Mercury 2 has 17 scored results on Noometry and Nemotron 4 340b Instruct has 17.

Related comparisons

Go deeper