Model comparison

Gemma 7B vs Muse Spark 1.1

Muse Spark 1.1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 49.9 to 30.0 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 14 shared benchmarks.

Gemma 7B Google

30.0

Rank #299 Confirmed

Muse Spark 1.1 Meta

49.9

Rank #51 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 14 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemma 7B scores higher in 0 categories and Muse Spark 1.1 in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Muse Spark 1.1 leads 73.4 to 27.1.
  • Gemma 7B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Gemma 7B and Muse Spark 1.1 specifications
Gemma 7BMuse Spark 1.1
ProviderGoogleMeta
Noometry Index30.049.9
Released2024-02-212026-04-08
WeightsOpenProprietary
Context window—1.05M
Max output—131K
Input $ / M tokens—$1.25
Output $ / M tokens—$4.25
Results tracked2737

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Muse Spark 1.1 leads

Gemma 7B: 30.5 (#294), Muse Spark 1.1: 51.3 (#40)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 7BMuse Spark 1.1
LMArena Coding10481498
DeepSWE—53.3%
LMArena WebDev—1542
SciCode—58.8%
HumanEval+28.7%—
MBPP+43.4%—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Gemma 7B: —, Muse Spark 1.1: 30.8 (#73)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 7BMuse Spark 1.1
APEX-Agents—31.8%
τ²-bench Banking—40.5%
GBAEval—7.9%
GDP.pdf—15%
Vending-Bench 2—6,520

Reasoning Muse Spark 1.1 leads

Gemma 7B: 19.9 (#249), Muse Spark 1.1: 47.1 (#44)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 7BMuse Spark 1.1
LMArena Hard Prompts10421486
Epoch Capabilities Index111.99154.21
NYT Connections (extended)—84.9%
CritPt—15.1%
DTBench—94.4%
LMCA—49.9%
Surface Evolver Bench—52.5%
Adversarial NLI48.7%—
BIG-Bench Hard55.1%—
HellaSwag82.2%—
PIQA81.2%—
WinoGrande79%—

Math Muse Spark 1.1 leads

Gemma 7B: 31.2 (#228), Muse Spark 1.1: 45.5 (#76)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 7BMuse Spark 1.1
LMArena Math10661483
ProofBench—39%
GSM8K46.4%—

Knowledge Muse Spark 1.1 leads

Gemma 7B: 27.3 (#252), Muse Spark 1.1: 53.1 (#59)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 7BMuse Spark 1.1
LMArena Expert10011478
SimpleQA Verified—57.8%
ARC (AI2) Challenge78.3%—
BoolQ83.2%—
MMLU66.1%—
OpenBookQA78.6%—
TriviaQA72.3%—

Multimodal Not comparable

Gemma 7B: —, Muse Spark 1.1: 42.6 (#29)

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 7BMuse Spark 1.1
LMArena Vision—1293
LMArena Document—1465

Multilingual Muse Spark 1.1 leads

Gemma 7B: 25.1 (#287), Muse Spark 1.1: 56.7 (#17)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 7BMuse Spark 1.1
LMArena Non-English9991472
LMArena Chinese10351518
LMArena French10251494
LMArena Russian9931483
LMArena German—1466
LMArena Japanese—1451
LMArena Korean—1458
LMArena Spanish—1464

Instruction Following Muse Spark 1.1 leads

Gemma 7B: 51.5 (#295), Muse Spark 1.1: 76.5 (#39)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 7BMuse Spark 1.1
LMArena Instruction Following10171457

Long Context Muse Spark 1.1 leads

Gemma 7B: 31.1 (#282), Muse Spark 1.1: 44.8 (#58)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 7BMuse Spark 1.1
LMArena Longer Query10221462

Writing & Preference Muse Spark 1.1 leads

Gemma 7B: 27.1 (#302), Muse Spark 1.1: 73.4 (#11)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 7BMuse Spark 1.1
LMArena Text10561479
LMArena Creative Writing10241437
LMArena Multi-Turn9631485
EQ-Bench Creative Writing—1927
EQ-Bench 4—1260

Frequently asked questions

Is Gemma 7B better than Muse Spark 1.1?

Muse Spark 1.1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 49.9 to 30.0 on the Noometry Index.

Is Gemma 7B or Muse Spark 1.1 better for coding?

Muse Spark 1.1 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 51.3 versus 30.5 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Gemma 7B and Muse Spark 1.1 share?

14 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 7B has 27 scored results on Noometry and Muse Spark 1.1 has 37.

Related comparisons

Go deeper