Model comparison

Gemma 7B vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro

MiMo-V2.6-Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 50.3 to 30.0 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 12 shared benchmarks.

Gemma 7B Google

30.0

Rank #299 Confirmed

MiMo-V2.6-Pro Xiaomi

50.3

Rank #49 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemma 7B scores higher in 0 categories and MiMo-V2.6-Pro in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads 66.8 to 27.1.

Side by side

Gemma 7B and MiMo-V2.6-Pro specifications
Gemma 7BMiMo-V2.6-Pro
ProviderGoogleXiaomi
Noometry Index30.050.3
Released2024-02-212026-09-21
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window—1.05M
Max output—131K
Input $ / M tokens—$0.43
Output $ / M tokens—$0.87
Results tracked2719

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads

Gemma 7B: 30.5 (#294), MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 55.5 (#23)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 7BMiMo-V2.6-Pro
LMArena Coding10481534
LMArena WebDev—1629
SciCode—60.9%
ALE-Bench—1,158
HumanEval+28.7%—
MBPP+43.4%—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Gemma 7B: —, MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 37.5 (#35)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 7BMiMo-V2.6-Pro
APEX-Agents—59.5%

Reasoning MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads

Gemma 7B: 19.9 (#249), MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 43.1 (#50)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 7BMiMo-V2.6-Pro
LMArena Hard Prompts10421512
CritPt—26.6%
Adversarial NLI48.7%—
BIG-Bench Hard55.1%—
Epoch Capabilities Index111.99—
HellaSwag82.2%—
PIQA81.2%—
WinoGrande79%—

Math MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads

Gemma 7B: 31.2 (#228), MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 54.5 (#45)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 7BMiMo-V2.6-Pro
LMArena Math10661494
ProofBench—70%
GSM8K46.4%—

Knowledge MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads

Gemma 7B: 27.3 (#252), MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 43.5 (#92)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 7BMiMo-V2.6-Pro
LMArena Expert10011543
ARC (AI2) Challenge78.3%—
BoolQ83.2%—
MMLU66.1%—
OpenBookQA78.6%—
TriviaQA72.3%—

Multimodal Not comparable

Gemma 7B: —, MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 40.8 (#43)

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 7BMiMo-V2.6-Pro
LMArena Vision—1264

Multilingual MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads

Gemma 7B: 25.1 (#287), MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 56.9 (#14)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 7BMiMo-V2.6-Pro
LMArena Non-English9991474
LMArena Chinese10351529
LMArena Russian9931480
LMArena French1025—

Instruction Following MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads

Gemma 7B: 51.5 (#295), MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 78.2 (#12)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 7BMiMo-V2.6-Pro
LMArena Instruction Following10171493

Long Context MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads

Gemma 7B: 31.1 (#282), MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 46.0 (#27)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 7BMiMo-V2.6-Pro
LMArena Longer Query10221501

Writing & Preference MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads

Gemma 7B: 27.1 (#302), MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 66.8 (#33)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 7BMiMo-V2.6-Pro
LMArena Text10561492
LMArena Creative Writing10241468
LMArena Multi-Turn9631464

Frequently asked questions

Is Gemma 7B better than MiMo-V2.6-Pro?

MiMo-V2.6-Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 50.3 to 30.0 on the Noometry Index.

Is Gemma 7B or MiMo-V2.6-Pro better for coding?

MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores higher on coding benchmarks: 55.5 versus 30.5 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Gemma 7B and MiMo-V2.6-Pro share?

12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 7B has 27 scored results on Noometry and MiMo-V2.6-Pro has 19.

Related comparisons

Go deeper