Model comparison
Claude Haiku 5.5 vs Gemma 7B
Claude Haiku 5.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 49.5 to 30.0 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
GoogleSummary
- The widest gap is in math, where Claude Haiku 5.5 leads 73.6 to 31.2.
- Gemma 7B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Claude Haiku 5.5 | Gemma 7B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Anthropic | |
| Noometry Index | 49.5 | 30.0 |
| Released | 2026-10-07 | 2024-02-21 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | 1M | — |
| Max output | 128K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.10 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $0.50 | — |
| Results tracked | 9 | 27 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Claude Haiku 5.5 leads
Claude Haiku 5.5: 49.2 (#50), Gemma 7B: 30.5 (#294)
| Benchmark | Claude Haiku 5.5 | Gemma 7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena WebDev | 1587 | — |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1048 |
| HumanEval+ | — | 28.7% |
| MBPP+ | — | 43.4% |
Reasoning Claude Haiku 5.5 leads
Claude Haiku 5.5: 35.2 (#69), Gemma 7B: 19.9 (#249)
| Benchmark | Claude Haiku 5.5 | Gemma 7B |
|---|---|---|
| NYT Connections (extended) | 65.7% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1042 |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | 30% | — |
| Adversarial NLI | — | 48.7% |
| BIG-Bench Hard | — | 55.1% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 111.99 |
| HellaSwag | — | 82.2% |
| PIQA | — | 81.2% |
| WinoGrande | — | 79% |
Math Claude Haiku 5.5 leads
Claude Haiku 5.5: 73.6 (#18), Gemma 7B: 31.2 (#228)
| Benchmark | Claude Haiku 5.5 | Gemma 7B |
|---|---|---|
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | 75.1% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | 46.3% | — |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 98.9% | — |
| LMArena Math | — | 1066 |
| GSM8K | — | 46.4% |
Knowledge Claude Haiku 5.5 leads
Claude Haiku 5.5: 50.8 (#70), Gemma 7B: 27.3 (#252)
| Benchmark | Claude Haiku 5.5 | Gemma 7B |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 89.6% | — |
| SimpleQA Verified | 23.8% | — |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1001 |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | — | 78.3% |
| BoolQ | — | 83.2% |
| MMLU | — | 66.1% |
| OpenBookQA | — | 78.6% |
| TriviaQA | — | 72.3% |
Multimodal Not comparable
Claude Haiku 5.5: 43.7 (#21), Gemma 7B: —
| Benchmark | Claude Haiku 5.5 | Gemma 7B |
|---|---|---|
| Furniture Assembly | 47.5% | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
Claude Haiku 5.5: —, Gemma 7B: 25.1 (#287)
| Benchmark | Claude Haiku 5.5 | Gemma 7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 999 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1035 |
| LMArena French | — | 1025 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 993 |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Claude Haiku 5.5: —, Gemma 7B: 51.5 (#295)
| Benchmark | Claude Haiku 5.5 | Gemma 7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1017 |
Long Context Not comparable
Claude Haiku 5.5: —, Gemma 7B: 31.1 (#282)
| Benchmark | Claude Haiku 5.5 | Gemma 7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1022 |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Claude Haiku 5.5: —, Gemma 7B: 27.1 (#302)
| Benchmark | Claude Haiku 5.5 | Gemma 7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1056 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1024 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 963 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Claude Haiku 5.5 better than Gemma 7B?
Claude Haiku 5.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 49.5 to 30.0 on the Noometry Index.
Is Claude Haiku 5.5 or Gemma 7B better for coding?
Claude Haiku 5.5 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 49.2 versus 30.5 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Claude Haiku 5.5 and Gemma 7B share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Claude Haiku 5.5 has 9 scored results on Noometry and Gemma 7B has 27.