Model comparison
Gemma 7B vs Mercury 2.5
Gemma 7B has enough public results to be ranked (#295); Mercury 2.5 does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
GoogleSummary
- The widest gap is in math, where Gemma 7B leads 28.7 to 22.4.
- Gemma 7B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Gemma 7B | Mercury 2.5 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Inception | |
| Noometry Index | 29.5 | 30.2 |
| Released | 2024-02-21 | 2026-09-08 |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | 260K |
| Max output | — | 66K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.04 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $0.15 |
| Results tracked | 27 | 2 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
Gemma 7B: 29.9 (#290), Mercury 2.5: —
| Benchmark | Gemma 7B | Mercury 2.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1048 | — |
| ALE-Bench | — | 301.65 |
| HumanEval+ | 28.7% | — |
| MBPP+ | 43.4% | — |
Reasoning Not comparable
Gemma 7B: 19.0 (#247), Mercury 2.5: —
| Benchmark | Gemma 7B | Mercury 2.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1042 | — |
| Adversarial NLI | 48.7% | — |
| BIG-Bench Hard | 55.1% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 111.74 | — |
| HellaSwag | 82.2% | — |
| PIQA | 81.2% | — |
| WinoGrande | 79% | — |
Math Gemma 7B leads
Gemma 7B: 28.7 (#225), Mercury 2.5: 22.4
| Benchmark | Gemma 7B | Mercury 2.5 |
|---|---|---|
| ProofBench | — | 3% |
| LMArena Math | 1066 | — |
| GSM8K | 46.4% | — |
Knowledge Not comparable
Gemma 7B: 26.8 (#248), Mercury 2.5: —
| Benchmark | Gemma 7B | Mercury 2.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1002 | — |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | 78.3% | — |
| BoolQ | 83.2% | — |
| MMLU | 66.1% | — |
| OpenBookQA | 78.6% | — |
| TriviaQA | 72.3% | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
Gemma 7B: 25.3 (#282), Mercury 2.5: —
| Benchmark | Gemma 7B | Mercury 2.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 999 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1035 | — |
| LMArena French | 1024 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 993 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Gemma 7B: 51.7 (#290), Mercury 2.5: —
| Benchmark | Gemma 7B | Mercury 2.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1017 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
Gemma 7B: 31.1 (#277), Mercury 2.5: —
| Benchmark | Gemma 7B | Mercury 2.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1022 | — |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Gemma 7B: 27.2 (#297), Mercury 2.5: —
| Benchmark | Gemma 7B | Mercury 2.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1056 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1024 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 963 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemma 7B better than Mercury 2.5?
Gemma 7B has enough public results to be ranked (#295); Mercury 2.5 does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.
How many benchmarks do Gemma 7B and Mercury 2.5 share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 7B has 27 scored results on Noometry and Mercury 2.5 has 2.