Noometry

Model comparison

Claude Opus 5.5 vs Gemma 7B

Claude Opus 5.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 68.6 to 30.0 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 14 shared benchmarks.

Claude Opus 5.5 Anthropic

68.6

Rank #3 Confirmed

Gemma 7B Google

30.0

Rank #299 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 14 benchmarks with published results for both. Claude Opus 5.5 scores higher in 8 categories and Gemma 7B in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in math, where Claude Opus 5.5 leads 91.8 to 31.2.
  • Gemma 7B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Claude Opus 5.5Gemma 7B
ProviderAnthropicGoogle
Noometry Index68.630.0
Released2026-09-222024-02-21
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window1M—
Max output128K—
Input $ / M tokens$4—
Output $ / M tokens$20—
Results tracked4427

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Claude Opus 5.5 leads

Claude Opus 5.5: 71.9 (#3), Gemma 7B: 30.5 (#294)

BenchmarkClaude Opus 5.5Gemma 7B
LMArena Coding15471048
FrontierCode54.6%—
CursorBench57.8%—
LMArena WebDev1813—
FrontierSWE62.3%—
SciCode66.9%—
MirrorCode77.4%—
ALE-Bench2,147—
HumanEval+—28.7%
MBPP+—43.4%

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Claude Opus 5.5: 45.3 (#15), Gemma 7B: —

BenchmarkClaude Opus 5.5Gemma 7B
APEX-Agents73.5%—
GDP.pdf30.6%—
Vending-Bench 29,235—

Reasoning Claude Opus 5.5 leads

Claude Opus 5.5: 80.2 (#3), Gemma 7B: 19.9 (#249)

BenchmarkClaude Opus 5.5Gemma 7B
LMArena Hard Prompts15351042
Epoch Capabilities Index167.33111.99
ARC-AGI-293.3%—
NYT Connections (extended)88.5%—
ARC-AGI-198.5%—
CritPt31.7%—
EBR-Bench71.4%—
Mystery Game Puzzles71%—
DTBench98.9%—
LMCA68.2%—
Adversarial NLI—48.7%
BIG-Bench Hard—55.1%
HellaSwag—82.2%
PIQA—81.2%
WinoGrande—79%

Math Claude Opus 5.5 leads

Claude Opus 5.5: 91.8 (#3), Gemma 7B: 31.2 (#228)

BenchmarkClaude Opus 5.5Gemma 7B
LMArena Math15061066
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)91.2%—
FrontierMath Tier 495%—
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025100%—
ProofBench100%—
FrontierMath Erdős2.9%—
GSM8K—46.4%

Knowledge Claude Opus 5.5 leads

Claude Opus 5.5: 66.4 (#10), Gemma 7B: 27.3 (#252)

BenchmarkClaude Opus 5.5Gemma 7B
LMArena Expert15471001
GPQA Diamond90.6%—
SimpleQA Verified72.2%—
ARC (AI2) Challenge—78.3%
BoolQ—83.2%
MMLU—66.1%
OpenBookQA—78.6%
TriviaQA—72.3%

Multimodal Not comparable

Claude Opus 5.5: 57.8 (#1), Gemma 7B: —

BenchmarkClaude Opus 5.5Gemma 7B
LMArena Vision1321—
Blueprint-Bench 251.2%—
Furniture Assembly83.3%—

Multilingual Claude Opus 5.5 leads

Claude Opus 5.5: 59.1 (#2), Gemma 7B: 25.1 (#287)

BenchmarkClaude Opus 5.5Gemma 7B
LMArena Non-English1507999
LMArena Chinese15881035
LMArena French15141025
LMArena Russian1520993
LMArena Spanish1507—

Instruction Following Claude Opus 5.5 leads

Claude Opus 5.5: 80.0 (#3), Gemma 7B: 51.5 (#295)

BenchmarkClaude Opus 5.5Gemma 7B
LMArena Instruction Following15371017

Long Context Claude Opus 5.5 leads

Claude Opus 5.5: 47.1 (#19), Gemma 7B: 31.1 (#282)

BenchmarkClaude Opus 5.5Gemma 7B
LMArena Longer Query15321022

Writing & Preference Claude Opus 5.5 leads

Claude Opus 5.5: 78.2 (#3), Gemma 7B: 27.1 (#302)

BenchmarkClaude Opus 5.5Gemma 7B
LMArena Text15151056
LMArena Creative Writing15331024
LMArena Multi-Turn1499963
EQ-Bench Creative Writing2050—

Frequently asked questions

Is Claude Opus 5.5 better than Gemma 7B?

Claude Opus 5.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 68.6 to 30.0 on the Noometry Index.

Is Claude Opus 5.5 or Gemma 7B better for coding?

Claude Opus 5.5 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 71.9 versus 30.5 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Claude Opus 5.5 and Gemma 7B share?

14 benchmarks have published results for both models. Claude Opus 5.5 has 44 scored results on Noometry and Gemma 7B has 27.

Related comparisons

Go deeper