Model comparison
Llama 3.2 90B vs Olmo 7b Instruct
Olmo 7b Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 30.3 to 27.5 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Summary
- The widest gap is in math, where Olmo 7b Instruct leads 30.2 to 11.1.
Side by side
| Llama 3.2 90B | Olmo 7b Instruct | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Meta | Allen Institute for AI (Ai2) |
| Noometry Index | 27.5 | 30.3 |
| Released | 2024-09-24 | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 9 | 10 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
Llama 3.2 90B: —, Olmo 7b Instruct: 29.6 (#303)
| Benchmark | Llama 3.2 90B | Olmo 7b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | — | 1016 |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Llama 3.2 90B: 30.0 (#80), Olmo 7b Instruct: —
| Benchmark | Llama 3.2 90B | Olmo 7b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| BALROG | 27.3% | — |
Reasoning Llama 3.2 90B leads
Llama 3.2 90B: 21.7 (#217), Olmo 7b Instruct: 18.8 (#274)
| Benchmark | Llama 3.2 90B | Olmo 7b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| EnigmaEval | 0.4% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 993 |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 125.5 | — |
Math Olmo 7b Instruct leads
Llama 3.2 90B: 11.1 (#308), Olmo 7b Instruct: 30.2 (#237)
| Benchmark | Llama 3.2 90B | Olmo 7b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 2.6% | — |
| LMArena Math | — | 1018 |
| MATH Level 5 | 39.4% | — |
Knowledge Not comparable
Llama 3.2 90B: 21.7 (#274), Olmo 7b Instruct: —
| Benchmark | Llama 3.2 90B | Olmo 7b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 41% | — |
| MMLU | 80.3% | — |
Multimodal Not comparable
Llama 3.2 90B: 25.4 (#124), Olmo 7b Instruct: —
| Benchmark | Llama 3.2 90B | Olmo 7b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1000 | — |
| GeoBench | 52% | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
Llama 3.2 90B: —, Olmo 7b Instruct: 24.0 (#291)
| Benchmark | Llama 3.2 90B | Olmo 7b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 977 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1014 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 947 |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Llama 3.2 90B: —, Olmo 7b Instruct: 49.0 (#301)
| Benchmark | Llama 3.2 90B | Olmo 7b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 978 |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Llama 3.2 90B: —, Olmo 7b Instruct: 25.8 (#303)
| Benchmark | Llama 3.2 90B | Olmo 7b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1032 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 990 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1007 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Llama 3.2 90B better than Olmo 7b Instruct?
Olmo 7b Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 30.3 to 27.5 on the Noometry Index.
How many benchmarks do Llama 3.2 90B and Olmo 7b Instruct share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Llama 3.2 90B has 9 scored results on Noometry and Olmo 7b Instruct has 10.