Model comparison

Gemma 7B vs Kimi K2 (Jul 2025)

Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) is the stronger model overall, scoring 40.9 to 29.5 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 14 shared benchmarks.

Gemma 7B Google

29.5

Rank #295 Confirmed

Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) Moonshot AI

40.9

Rank #134 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 14 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemma 7B scores higher in 0 categories and Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) leads 62.5 to 27.2.

Side by side

Gemma 7B and Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) specifications
Gemma 7BKimi K2 (Jul 2025)
ProviderGoogleMoonshot AI
Noometry Index29.540.9
Released2024-02-212025-07-12
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window—262K
Max output—262K
Input $ / M tokens—$0.57
Output $ / M tokens—$2.30
Results tracked2742

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) leads

Gemma 7B: 29.9 (#290), Kimi K2 (Jul 2025): 43.1 (#83)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 7BKimi K2 (Jul 2025)
LMArena Coding10481399
SWE-bench Verified (bash only)—63.4%
Aider Polyglot—59.1%
GSO—4.9%
WeirdML—42.8%
ALE-Bench—597.5
HumanEval+28.7%—
MBPP+43.4%—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Gemma 7B: —, Kimi K2 (Jul 2025): 32.2 (#59)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 7BKimi K2 (Jul 2025)
Terminal-Bench—35.7%
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard—59.1%
METR Time Horizons—59.2%

Reasoning Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) leads

Gemma 7B: 19.0 (#247), Kimi K2 (Jul 2025): 22.7 (#173)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 7BKimi K2 (Jul 2025)
LMArena Hard Prompts10421384
Epoch Capabilities Index111.74146.02
SimpleBench—26.3%
Kagi LLM Benchmark—64.4%
Adversarial NLI48.7%—
BIG-Bench Hard55.1%—
ForecastBench—60.2
HellaSwag82.2%—
PIQA81.2%—
WinoGrande79%—

Math Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) leads

Gemma 7B: 28.7 (#225), Kimi K2 (Jul 2025): 40.1 (#81)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 7BKimi K2 (Jul 2025)
LMArena Math10661396
Omni-MATH—65.4%
FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set)—21.4%
FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1)—0%
GSM8K46.4%—

Knowledge Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) leads

Gemma 7B: 26.8 (#248), Kimi K2 (Jul 2025): 36.9 (#153)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 7BKimi K2 (Jul 2025)
LMArena Expert10021363
MMLU-Pro—81.9%
Confabulations—20.4%
Vectara Hallucination Rate—17.9%
GPQA (HELM)—65.3%
ARC (AI2) Challenge78.3%—
BoolQ83.2%—
MMLU66.1%—
OpenBookQA78.6%—
TriviaQA72.3%—

Multilingual Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) leads

Gemma 7B: 25.3 (#282), Kimi K2 (Jul 2025): 49.8 (#125)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 7BKimi K2 (Jul 2025)
LMArena Non-English9991372
LMArena Chinese10351416
LMArena French10241379
LMArena Russian9931384
LMArena German—1386
LMArena Japanese—1349
LMArena Korean—1324
LMArena Spanish—1383

Instruction Following Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) leads

Gemma 7B: 51.7 (#290), Kimi K2 (Jul 2025): 71.3 (#151)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 7BKimi K2 (Jul 2025)
LMArena Instruction Following10171347
IFEval—85%

Long Context Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) leads

Gemma 7B: 31.1 (#277), Kimi K2 (Jul 2025): 41.2 (#140)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 7BKimi K2 (Jul 2025)
LMArena Longer Query10221353
Fiction.LiveBench—66.7%
CL-bench—17.6%

Writing & Preference Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) leads

Gemma 7B: 27.2 (#297), Kimi K2 (Jul 2025): 62.5 (#76)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 7BKimi K2 (Jul 2025)
LMArena Text10561380
LMArena Creative Writing10241349
LMArena Multi-Turn9631371
Short-Story Creative Writing—85.6%
EQ-Bench Creative Writing—1666
WildBench—86.2%

Frequently asked questions

Is Gemma 7B better than Kimi K2 (Jul 2025)?

Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) is the stronger model overall, scoring 40.9 to 29.5 on the Noometry Index.

Is Gemma 7B or Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) better for coding?

Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) scores higher on coding benchmarks: 43.1 versus 29.9 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Gemma 7B and Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) share?

14 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 7B has 27 scored results on Noometry and Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) has 42.

Related comparisons

Go deeper