Model comparison
Gemma 7B vs Hunyuan T1 20250711
Hunyuan T1 20250711 is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.5 to 30.0 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 12 shared benchmarks.
Google
TencentSummary
- They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemma 7B scores higher in 0 categories and Hunyuan T1 20250711 in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Hunyuan T1 20250711 leads 59.5 to 27.1.
- Gemma 7B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Gemma 7B | Hunyuan T1 20250711 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Tencent | |
| Noometry Index | 30.0 | 42.5 |
| Released | 2024-02-21 | — |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 27 | 13 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Hunyuan T1 20250711 leads
Gemma 7B: 30.5 (#294), Hunyuan T1 20250711: 40.9 (#129)
| Benchmark | Gemma 7B | Hunyuan T1 20250711 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1048 | 1390 |
| HumanEval+ | 28.7% | — |
| MBPP+ | 43.4% | — |
Reasoning Hunyuan T1 20250711 leads
Gemma 7B: 19.9 (#249), Hunyuan T1 20250711: 28.5 (#103)
| Benchmark | Gemma 7B | Hunyuan T1 20250711 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1042 | 1399 |
| Adversarial NLI | 48.7% | — |
| BIG-Bench Hard | 55.1% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 111.99 | — |
| HellaSwag | 82.2% | — |
| PIQA | 81.2% | — |
| WinoGrande | 79% | — |
Math Hunyuan T1 20250711 leads
Gemma 7B: 31.2 (#228), Hunyuan T1 20250711: 38.7 (#130)
| Benchmark | Gemma 7B | Hunyuan T1 20250711 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1066 | 1414 |
| GSM8K | 46.4% | — |
Knowledge Hunyuan T1 20250711 leads
Gemma 7B: 27.3 (#252), Hunyuan T1 20250711: 38.8 (#141)
| Benchmark | Gemma 7B | Hunyuan T1 20250711 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1001 | 1395 |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | 78.3% | — |
| BoolQ | 83.2% | — |
| MMLU | 66.1% | — |
| OpenBookQA | 78.6% | — |
| TriviaQA | 72.3% | — |
Multilingual Hunyuan T1 20250711 leads
Gemma 7B: 25.1 (#287), Hunyuan T1 20250711: 51.2 (#112)
| Benchmark | Gemma 7B | Hunyuan T1 20250711 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 999 | 1395 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1035 | 1425 |
| LMArena Russian | 993 | 1385 |
| LMArena French | 1025 | — |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1406 |
Instruction Following Hunyuan T1 20250711 leads
Gemma 7B: 51.5 (#295), Hunyuan T1 20250711: 72.6 (#138)
| Benchmark | Gemma 7B | Hunyuan T1 20250711 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1017 | 1374 |
Long Context Hunyuan T1 20250711 leads
Gemma 7B: 31.1 (#282), Hunyuan T1 20250711: 42.2 (#128)
| Benchmark | Gemma 7B | Hunyuan T1 20250711 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1022 | 1384 |
Writing & Preference Hunyuan T1 20250711 leads
Gemma 7B: 27.1 (#302), Hunyuan T1 20250711: 59.5 (#109)
| Benchmark | Gemma 7B | Hunyuan T1 20250711 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1056 | 1401 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1024 | 1392 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 963 | 1393 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemma 7B better than Hunyuan T1 20250711?
Hunyuan T1 20250711 is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.5 to 30.0 on the Noometry Index.
Is Gemma 7B or Hunyuan T1 20250711 better for coding?
Hunyuan T1 20250711 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 40.9 versus 30.5 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Gemma 7B and Hunyuan T1 20250711 share?
12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 7B has 27 scored results on Noometry and Hunyuan T1 20250711 has 13.