Model comparison
Hunyuan T1 20250711 vs Qwen2-72B
Hunyuan T1 20250711 is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.5 to 30.0 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 13 shared benchmarks.
Tencent
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- They share 13 benchmarks with published results for both. Hunyuan T1 20250711 scores higher in 8 categories and Qwen2-72B in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Hunyuan T1 20250711 leads 59.5 to 40.8.
- Qwen2-72B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Hunyuan T1 20250711 | Qwen2-72B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Tencent | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 42.5 | 30.0 |
| Released | — | 2024-06-07 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 13 | 26 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Hunyuan T1 20250711 leads
Hunyuan T1 20250711: 40.9 (#129), Qwen2-72B: 29.1 (#310)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan T1 20250711 | Qwen2-72B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1390 | 1196 |
| WeirdML | — | 11.3% |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | — | 38.5% |
| BigCodeBench Complete | — | 54% |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Hunyuan T1 20250711: —, Qwen2-72B: 17.0 (#146)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan T1 20250711 | Qwen2-72B |
|---|---|---|
| TheAgentCompany | — | 1.1% |
| METR Time Horizons | — | 29.9% |
Reasoning Hunyuan T1 20250711 leads
Hunyuan T1 20250711: 28.5 (#103), Qwen2-72B: 23.2 (#181)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan T1 20250711 | Qwen2-72B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1399 | 1191 |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 125.28 |
Math Hunyuan T1 20250711 leads
Hunyuan T1 20250711: 38.7 (#130), Qwen2-72B: 30.2 (#236)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan T1 20250711 | Qwen2-72B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1414 | 1235 |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 39.1% |
Knowledge Hunyuan T1 20250711 leads
Hunyuan T1 20250711: 38.8 (#141), Qwen2-72B: 21.2 (#275)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan T1 20250711 | Qwen2-72B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1395 | 1171 |
| GPQA Diamond | — | 40.8% |
| MMLU | — | 82.4% |
Multilingual Hunyuan T1 20250711 leads
Hunyuan T1 20250711: 51.2 (#112), Qwen2-72B: 35.9 (#244)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan T1 20250711 | Qwen2-72B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1395 | 1176 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1425 | 1240 |
| LMArena Korean | 1406 | 1083 |
| LMArena Russian | 1385 | 1169 |
| LMArena French | — | 1170 |
| LMArena German | — | 1151 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1111 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1169 |
Instruction Following Hunyuan T1 20250711 leads
Hunyuan T1 20250711: 72.6 (#138), Qwen2-72B: 61.7 (#241)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan T1 20250711 | Qwen2-72B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1374 | 1181 |
Long Context Hunyuan T1 20250711 leads
Hunyuan T1 20250711: 42.2 (#128), Qwen2-72B: 36.1 (#235)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan T1 20250711 | Qwen2-72B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1384 | 1192 |
Writing & Preference Hunyuan T1 20250711 leads
Hunyuan T1 20250711: 59.5 (#109), Qwen2-72B: 40.8 (#241)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan T1 20250711 | Qwen2-72B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1401 | 1203 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1392 | 1181 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1393 | 1196 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Hunyuan T1 20250711 better than Qwen2-72B?
Hunyuan T1 20250711 is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.5 to 30.0 on the Noometry Index.
Is Hunyuan T1 20250711 or Qwen2-72B better for coding?
Hunyuan T1 20250711 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 40.9 versus 29.1 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Hunyuan T1 20250711 and Qwen2-72B share?
13 benchmarks have published results for both models. Hunyuan T1 20250711 has 13 scored results on Noometry and Qwen2-72B has 26.