Model comparison

Gemma 7B vs Qwen3.5-Flash

Qwen3.5-Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.5 to 30.0 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 14 shared benchmarks.

Gemma 7B Google

30.0

Rank #299 Confirmed

Qwen3.5-Flash Alibaba (Qwen)

42.5

Rank #112 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 14 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemma 7B scores higher in 0 categories and Qwen3.5-Flash in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Qwen3.5-Flash leads 57.9 to 27.1.
  • Gemma 7B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Gemma 7B and Qwen3.5-Flash specifications
Gemma 7BQwen3.5-Flash
ProviderGoogleAlibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index30.042.5
Released2024-02-212026-02-23
WeightsOpenProprietary
Context window—1M
Max output—66K
Input $ / M tokens—$0.10
Output $ / M tokens—$0.40
Results tracked2732

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Qwen3.5-Flash leads

Gemma 7B: 30.5 (#294), Qwen3.5-Flash: 34.2 (#242)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 7BQwen3.5-Flash
LMArena Coding10481412
LMArena WebDev—1244
ALE-Bench—221.8
HumanEval+28.7%—
MBPP+43.4%—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Gemma 7B: —, Qwen3.5-Flash: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 7BQwen3.5-Flash
Vending-Bench 2—462.69

Reasoning Qwen3.5-Flash leads

Gemma 7B: 19.9 (#249), Qwen3.5-Flash: 33.7 (#72)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 7BQwen3.5-Flash
LMArena Hard Prompts10421403
Epoch Capabilities Index111.99143.98
Chess Puzzles—21%
Mystery Game Puzzles—20%
DTBench—82.9%
LMCA—29.1%
Adversarial NLI48.7%—
BIG-Bench Hard55.1%—
HellaSwag82.2%—
PIQA81.2%—
WinoGrande79%—

Math Qwen3.5-Flash leads

Gemma 7B: 31.2 (#228), Qwen3.5-Flash: 37.4 (#158)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 7BQwen3.5-Flash
LMArena Math10661407
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)—18.2%
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—84.4%
FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set)—6.2%
FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1)—0%
GSM8K46.4%—

Knowledge Qwen3.5-Flash leads

Gemma 7B: 27.3 (#252), Qwen3.5-Flash: 43.2 (#93)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 7BQwen3.5-Flash
LMArena Expert10011407
GPQA Diamond—82.3%
SimpleQA Verified—20.3%
Vectara Hallucination Rate—10.5%
ARC (AI2) Challenge78.3%—
BoolQ83.2%—
MMLU66.1%—
OpenBookQA78.6%—
TriviaQA72.3%—

Multilingual Qwen3.5-Flash leads

Gemma 7B: 25.1 (#287), Qwen3.5-Flash: 50.5 (#121)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 7BQwen3.5-Flash
LMArena Non-English9991385
LMArena Chinese10351446
LMArena French10251412
LMArena Russian9931379
LMArena German—1390
LMArena Japanese—1368
LMArena Korean—1344
LMArena Spanish—1400

Instruction Following Qwen3.5-Flash leads

Gemma 7B: 51.5 (#295), Qwen3.5-Flash: 72.6 (#139)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 7BQwen3.5-Flash
LMArena Instruction Following10171374

Long Context Qwen3.5-Flash leads

Gemma 7B: 31.1 (#282), Qwen3.5-Flash: 42.4 (#124)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 7BQwen3.5-Flash
LMArena Longer Query10221392

Writing & Preference Qwen3.5-Flash leads

Gemma 7B: 27.1 (#302), Qwen3.5-Flash: 57.9 (#122)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 7BQwen3.5-Flash
LMArena Text10561397
LMArena Creative Writing10241343
LMArena Multi-Turn9631393

Frequently asked questions

Is Gemma 7B better than Qwen3.5-Flash?

Qwen3.5-Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.5 to 30.0 on the Noometry Index.

Is Gemma 7B or Qwen3.5-Flash better for coding?

Qwen3.5-Flash scores higher on coding benchmarks: 34.2 versus 30.5 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Gemma 7B and Qwen3.5-Flash share?

14 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 7B has 27 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.5-Flash has 32.

Related comparisons

Go deeper