Model comparison

Gemma 7B vs Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent

Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent is the stronger model overall, scoring 46.2 to 30.0 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 13 shared benchmarks.

Gemma 7B Google

30.0

Rank #299 Confirmed

Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent xAI

46.2

Rank #65 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 13 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemma 7B scores higher in 0 categories and Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent leads 64.0 to 27.1.
  • Gemma 7B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Gemma 7B and Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent specifications
Gemma 7BGrok 4.20 Multi-Agent
ProviderGooglexAI
Noometry Index30.046.2
Released2024-02-212026-03-09
WeightsOpenProprietary
Context window—1M
Max output—30K
Input $ / M tokens—$1.25
Output $ / M tokens—$2.50
Results tracked2720

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent leads

Gemma 7B: 30.5 (#294), Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent: 43.0 (#92)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 7BGrok 4.20 Multi-Agent
LMArena Coding10481457
HumanEval+28.7%—
MBPP+43.4%—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Gemma 7B: —, Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 7BGrok 4.20 Multi-Agent
LMArena Search—1204

Reasoning Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent leads

Gemma 7B: 19.9 (#249), Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent: 43.9 (#48)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 7BGrok 4.20 Multi-Agent
LMArena Hard Prompts10421448
NYT Connections (extended)—89.6%
Adversarial NLI48.7%—
BIG-Bench Hard55.1%—
Epoch Capabilities Index111.99—
HellaSwag82.2%—
PIQA81.2%—
WinoGrande79%—

Math Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent leads

Gemma 7B: 31.2 (#228), Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent: 39.4 (#104)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 7BGrok 4.20 Multi-Agent
LMArena Math10661442
GSM8K46.4%—

Knowledge Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent leads

Gemma 7B: 27.3 (#252), Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent: 40.4 (#119)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 7BGrok 4.20 Multi-Agent
LMArena Expert10011445
ARC (AI2) Challenge78.3%—
BoolQ83.2%—
MMLU66.1%—
OpenBookQA78.6%—
TriviaQA72.3%—

Multimodal Not comparable

Gemma 7B: —, Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent: 40.5 (#48)

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 7BGrok 4.20 Multi-Agent
LMArena Vision—1259

Multilingual Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent leads

Gemma 7B: 25.1 (#287), Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent: 54.4 (#43)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 7BGrok 4.20 Multi-Agent
LMArena Non-English9991440
LMArena Chinese10351475
LMArena French10251466
LMArena Russian9931457
LMArena German—1456
LMArena Japanese—1405
LMArena Korean—1416
LMArena Spanish—1447

Instruction Following Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent leads

Gemma 7B: 51.5 (#295), Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent: 74.8 (#84)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 7BGrok 4.20 Multi-Agent
LMArena Instruction Following10171420

Long Context Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent leads

Gemma 7B: 31.1 (#282), Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent: 43.7 (#88)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 7BGrok 4.20 Multi-Agent
LMArena Longer Query10221431

Writing & Preference Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent leads

Gemma 7B: 27.1 (#302), Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent: 64.0 (#59)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 7BGrok 4.20 Multi-Agent
LMArena Text10561450
LMArena Creative Writing10241436
LMArena Multi-Turn9631452

Frequently asked questions

Is Gemma 7B better than Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent?

Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent is the stronger model overall, scoring 46.2 to 30.0 on the Noometry Index.

Is Gemma 7B or Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent better for coding?

Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent scores higher on coding benchmarks: 43.0 versus 30.5 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Gemma 7B and Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent share?

13 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 7B has 27 scored results on Noometry and Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent has 20.

Related comparisons

Go deeper