Model comparison
Gemma 7B vs Inkling-Small
Inkling-Small is the stronger model overall, scoring 46.5 to 30.0 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 14 shared benchmarks.
GoogleSummary
- They share 14 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemma 7B scores higher in 0 categories and Inkling-Small in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Inkling-Small leads 59.6 to 27.1.
Side by side
| Gemma 7B | Inkling-Small | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Thinking Machines Lab | |
| Noometry Index | 30.0 | 46.5 |
| Released | 2024-02-21 | 2026-07-15 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | 524K |
| Max output | — | 1.05M |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.45 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $1.20 |
| Results tracked | 27 | 33 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Inkling-Small leads
Gemma 7B: 30.5 (#294), Inkling-Small: 43.6 (#85)
| Benchmark | Gemma 7B | Inkling-Small |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1048 | 1451 |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1409 |
| SciCode | — | 48.7% |
| HumanEval+ | 28.7% | — |
| MBPP+ | 43.4% | — |
Reasoning Inkling-Small leads
Gemma 7B: 19.9 (#249), Inkling-Small: 38.6 (#63)
| Benchmark | Gemma 7B | Inkling-Small |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1042 | 1423 |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 111.99 | 150.15 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | — | 40.1% |
| ARC-AGI-1 | — | 84% |
| CritPt | — | 8.3% |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 18% |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | — | 6% |
| Adversarial NLI | 48.7% | — |
| BIG-Bench Hard | 55.1% | — |
| HellaSwag | 82.2% | — |
| PIQA | 81.2% | — |
| WinoGrande | 79% | — |
Math Inkling-Small leads
Gemma 7B: 31.2 (#228), Inkling-Small: 45.1 (#77)
| Benchmark | Gemma 7B | Inkling-Small |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1066 | 1459 |
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | — | 46.3% |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | — | 17.1% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 90% |
| ProofBench | — | 6% |
| GSM8K | 46.4% | — |
Knowledge Inkling-Small leads
Gemma 7B: 27.3 (#252), Inkling-Small: 48.2 (#77)
| Benchmark | Gemma 7B | Inkling-Small |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1001 | 1442 |
| GPQA Diamond | — | 88.5% |
| SimpleQA Verified | — | 19.1% |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | 78.3% | — |
| BoolQ | 83.2% | — |
| MMLU | 66.1% | — |
| OpenBookQA | 78.6% | — |
| TriviaQA | 72.3% | — |
Multimodal Not comparable
Gemma 7B: —, Inkling-Small: 39.1 (#62)
| Benchmark | Gemma 7B | Inkling-Small |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1235 |
Multilingual Inkling-Small leads
Gemma 7B: 25.1 (#287), Inkling-Small: 51.7 (#104)
| Benchmark | Gemma 7B | Inkling-Small |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 999 | 1402 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1035 | 1465 |
| LMArena French | 1025 | 1436 |
| LMArena Russian | 993 | 1391 |
| LMArena German | — | 1405 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1405 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1363 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1428 |
Instruction Following Inkling-Small leads
Gemma 7B: 51.5 (#295), Inkling-Small: 73.8 (#114)
| Benchmark | Gemma 7B | Inkling-Small |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1017 | 1399 |
Long Context Inkling-Small leads
Gemma 7B: 31.1 (#282), Inkling-Small: 42.7 (#118)
| Benchmark | Gemma 7B | Inkling-Small |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1022 | 1401 |
Writing & Preference Inkling-Small leads
Gemma 7B: 27.1 (#302), Inkling-Small: 59.6 (#107)
| Benchmark | Gemma 7B | Inkling-Small |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1056 | 1414 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1024 | 1331 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 963 | 1418 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | — | 1491 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemma 7B better than Inkling-Small?
Inkling-Small is the stronger model overall, scoring 46.5 to 30.0 on the Noometry Index.
Is Gemma 7B or Inkling-Small better for coding?
Inkling-Small scores higher on coding benchmarks: 43.6 versus 30.5 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Gemma 7B and Inkling-Small share?
14 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 7B has 27 scored results on Noometry and Inkling-Small has 33.