Model comparison

Gemma 7B vs GLM-5

GLM-5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 46.1 to 30.0 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 14 shared benchmarks.

Gemma 7B Google

30.0

Rank #299 Confirmed

GLM-5 Z.ai (Zhipu)

46.1

Rank #66 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 14 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemma 7B scores higher in 0 categories and GLM-5 in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where GLM-5 leads 66.0 to 27.1.

Side by side

Gemma 7B and GLM-5 specifications
Gemma 7BGLM-5
ProviderGoogleZ.ai (Zhipu)
Noometry Index30.046.1
Released2024-02-212026-02-11
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window—205K
Max output—131K
Input $ / M tokens—$1
Output $ / M tokens—$3.20
Results tracked2745

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding GLM-5 leads

Gemma 7B: 30.5 (#294), GLM-5: 49.0 (#52)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 7BGLM-5
LMArena Coding10481461
SWE-bench Verified—72.1%
SWE-bench Verified (bash only)—72.8%
LMArena WebDev—1434
SWE-bench Multilingual—69.7%
WeirdML—48.2%
ALE-Bench—765.62
HumanEval+28.7%—
MBPP+43.4%—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Gemma 7B: —, GLM-5: 31.1 (#71)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 7BGLM-5
Terminal-Bench—52.4%
τ²-bench Airline—82.5%
τ²-bench Banking—9.8%
τ²-bench Retail—73.7%
τ²-bench Telecom—86.8%
Vending-Bench 2—4,432

Reasoning GLM-5 leads

Gemma 7B: 19.9 (#249), GLM-5: 27.6 (#116)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 7BGLM-5
LMArena Hard Prompts10421452
Epoch Capabilities Index111.99145.83
ARC-AGI-2—4.9%
SimpleBench—53.2%
Kagi LLM Benchmark—75%
NYT Connections (extended)—74.8%
ARC-AGI-1—44.7%
Chess Puzzles—10%
Adversarial NLI48.7%—
BIG-Bench Hard55.1%—
ForecastBench—61
HellaSwag82.2%—
PIQA81.2%—
WinoGrande79%—

Math GLM-5 leads

Gemma 7B: 31.2 (#228), GLM-5: 46.4 (#71)

Knowledge GLM-5 leads

Gemma 7B: 27.3 (#252), GLM-5: 52.3 (#64)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 7BGLM-5
LMArena Expert10011454
GPQA Diamond—87.8%
Vectara Hallucination Rate—10.1%
ARC (AI2) Challenge78.3%—
BoolQ83.2%—
MMLU66.1%—
OpenBookQA78.6%—
TriviaQA72.3%—

Multilingual GLM-5 leads

Gemma 7B: 25.1 (#287), GLM-5: 53.7 (#58)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 7BGLM-5
LMArena Non-English9991430
LMArena Chinese10351511
LMArena French10251455
LMArena Russian9931436
LMArena German—1445
LMArena Japanese—1416
LMArena Korean—1423
LMArena Spanish—1454

Instruction Following GLM-5 leads

Gemma 7B: 51.5 (#295), GLM-5: 75.2 (#67)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 7BGLM-5
LMArena Instruction Following10171428

Long Context GLM-5 leads

Gemma 7B: 31.1 (#282), GLM-5: 44.7 (#60)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 7BGLM-5
LMArena Longer Query10221446
CL-bench—18.7%

Writing & Preference GLM-5 leads

Gemma 7B: 27.1 (#302), GLM-5: 66.0 (#38)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 7BGLM-5
LMArena Text10561446
LMArena Creative Writing10241439
LMArena Multi-Turn9631456
EQ-Bench Creative Writing—1601

Frequently asked questions

Is Gemma 7B better than GLM-5?

GLM-5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 46.1 to 30.0 on the Noometry Index.

Is Gemma 7B or GLM-5 better for coding?

GLM-5 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 49.0 versus 30.5 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Gemma 7B and GLM-5 share?

14 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 7B has 27 scored results on Noometry and GLM-5 has 45.

Related comparisons

Go deeper