Model comparison
Gemma 7B vs Muse Glimmer
Muse Glimmer is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.7 to 30.0 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 12 shared benchmarks.
Google
MetaSummary
- They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemma 7B scores higher in 0 categories and Muse Glimmer in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Muse Glimmer leads 57.5 to 27.1.
Side by side
| Gemma 7B | Muse Glimmer | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Meta | |
| Noometry Index | 30.0 | 41.7 |
| Released | 2024-02-21 | 2026-08-10 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 27 | 15 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Muse Glimmer leads
Gemma 7B: 30.5 (#294), Muse Glimmer: 40.4 (#142)
| Benchmark | Gemma 7B | Muse Glimmer |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1048 | 1416 |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1355 |
| SciCode | — | 44.9% |
| HumanEval+ | 28.7% | — |
| MBPP+ | 43.4% | — |
Reasoning Muse Glimmer leads
Gemma 7B: 19.9 (#249), Muse Glimmer: 25.7 (#144)
| Benchmark | Gemma 7B | Muse Glimmer |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1042 | 1396 |
| CritPt | — | 2.6% |
| Adversarial NLI | 48.7% | — |
| BIG-Bench Hard | 55.1% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 111.99 | — |
| HellaSwag | 82.2% | — |
| PIQA | 81.2% | — |
| WinoGrande | 79% | — |
Math Muse Glimmer leads
Gemma 7B: 31.2 (#228), Muse Glimmer: 38.8 (#125)
| Benchmark | Gemma 7B | Muse Glimmer |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1066 | 1417 |
| GSM8K | 46.4% | — |
Knowledge Muse Glimmer leads
Gemma 7B: 27.3 (#252), Muse Glimmer: 38.5 (#143)
| Benchmark | Gemma 7B | Muse Glimmer |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1001 | 1386 |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | 78.3% | — |
| BoolQ | 83.2% | — |
| MMLU | 66.1% | — |
| OpenBookQA | 78.6% | — |
| TriviaQA | 72.3% | — |
Multilingual Muse Glimmer leads
Gemma 7B: 25.1 (#287), Muse Glimmer: 50.5 (#122)
| Benchmark | Gemma 7B | Muse Glimmer |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 999 | 1384 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1035 | 1412 |
| LMArena Russian | 993 | 1390 |
| LMArena French | 1025 | — |
Instruction Following Muse Glimmer leads
Gemma 7B: 51.5 (#295), Muse Glimmer: 72.6 (#135)
| Benchmark | Gemma 7B | Muse Glimmer |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1017 | 1375 |
Long Context Muse Glimmer leads
Gemma 7B: 31.1 (#282), Muse Glimmer: 42.1 (#129)
| Benchmark | Gemma 7B | Muse Glimmer |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1022 | 1382 |
Writing & Preference Muse Glimmer leads
Gemma 7B: 27.1 (#302), Muse Glimmer: 57.5 (#126)
| Benchmark | Gemma 7B | Muse Glimmer |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1056 | 1389 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1024 | 1339 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 963 | 1399 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemma 7B better than Muse Glimmer?
Muse Glimmer is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.7 to 30.0 on the Noometry Index.
Is Gemma 7B or Muse Glimmer better for coding?
Muse Glimmer scores higher on coding benchmarks: 40.4 versus 30.5 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Gemma 7B and Muse Glimmer share?
12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 7B has 27 scored results on Noometry and Muse Glimmer has 15.