Noometry

Model comparison

Gemma 4 31B IT vs Mistral Nemo

Gemma 4 31B IT is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.5 to 26.4 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 4 shared benchmarks.

Gemma 4 31B IT Google

43.5

Rank #90 Confirmed

Mistral Nemo Mistral AI

26.4

Rank #337 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 4 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemma 4 31B IT scores higher in 4 categories and Mistral Nemo in 0 categories; 4 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Gemma 4 31B IT leads 60.5 to 28.5.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is GPQA Diamond: 75.8% for Gemma 4 31B IT and 29.9% for Mistral Nemo.
  • Both cost about the same: $0.09 input and $0.34 output per million tokens.
  • Gemma 4 31B IT accepts more context: 262K tokens versus 128K.

Side by side

Gemma 4 31B ITMistral Nemo
ProviderGoogleMistral AI
Noometry Index43.526.4
Released2026-04-022024-07-01
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window262K128K
Max output33K128K
Input $ / M tokens$0.09$0.15
Output $ / M tokens$0.34$0.15
Results tracked3510

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Not comparable

Gemma 4 31B IT: 42.3 (#108), Mistral Nemo: —

BenchmarkGemma 4 31B ITMistral Nemo
LMArena WebDev1366—
SciCode43.4%—
WeirdML52.3%—
LMArena Coding1459—
ALE-Bench925.5—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Gemma 4 31B IT: —, Mistral Nemo: 23.5 (#125)

BenchmarkGemma 4 31B ITMistral Nemo
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard—27.6%
BALROG—17.6%

Reasoning Gemma 4 31B IT leads

Gemma 4 31B IT: 27.2 (#122), Mistral Nemo: 20.7 (#232)

BenchmarkGemma 4 31B ITMistral Nemo
DTBench82.7%48.6%
Epoch Capabilities Index142.74118.68
Kagi LLM Benchmark63.5%—
NYT Connections (extended)70.6%—
CritPt1.4%—
Chess Puzzles5%—
Thematic Generalization53%—
LMArena Hard Prompts1448—
LMCA39.3%—
Surface Evolver Bench30.6%—
PIQA—83.5%

Math Gemma 4 31B IT leads

Gemma 4 31B IT: 43.2 (#81), Mistral Nemo: 25.5 (#268)

BenchmarkGemma 4 31B ITMistral Nemo
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202573.3%—
LMArena Math1465—
MATH Level 5—10.8%
GSM8K—84.2%

Knowledge Gemma 4 31B IT leads

Gemma 4 31B IT: 37.9 (#151), Mistral Nemo: 12.3 (#298)

BenchmarkGemma 4 31B ITMistral Nemo
GPQA Diamond75.8%29.9%
SimpleQA Verified10.4%—
Vectara Hallucination Rate7.4%—
LMArena Expert1465—
BoolQ—82.5%

Multimodal Not comparable

Gemma 4 31B IT: 41.6 (#34), Mistral Nemo: —

BenchmarkGemma 4 31B ITMistral Nemo
LMArena Vision1277—
LMArena Document1425—

Multilingual Not comparable

Gemma 4 31B IT: 53.8 (#57), Mistral Nemo: —

BenchmarkGemma 4 31B ITMistral Nemo
LMArena Non-English1431—
LMArena Chinese1476—
LMArena French1435—
LMArena Russian1460—
LMArena Spanish1444—

Instruction Following Not comparable

Gemma 4 31B IT: 75.5 (#61), Mistral Nemo: —

BenchmarkGemma 4 31B ITMistral Nemo
LMArena Instruction Following1433—

Long Context Not comparable

Gemma 4 31B IT: 44.2 (#71), Mistral Nemo: —

BenchmarkGemma 4 31B ITMistral Nemo
LMArena Longer Query1446—

Writing & Preference Gemma 4 31B IT leads

Gemma 4 31B IT: 60.5 (#96), Mistral Nemo: 28.5 (#296)

BenchmarkGemma 4 31B ITMistral Nemo
EQ-Bench Creative Writing1368881
LMArena Text1443—
LMArena Creative Writing1415—
EQ-Bench 41120—
LMArena Multi-Turn1452—

Frequently asked questions

Is Gemma 4 31B IT better than Mistral Nemo?

Gemma 4 31B IT is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.5 to 26.4 on the Noometry Index.

Which is cheaper, Gemma 4 31B IT or Mistral Nemo?

Mistral Nemo is cheaper. It lists at $0.15 per million input tokens and $0.15 per million output tokens; Gemma 4 31B IT lists at $0.09 and $0.34.

Which has the bigger context window?

Gemma 4 31B IT does, with 262K tokens against 128K.

How many benchmarks do Gemma 4 31B IT and Mistral Nemo share?

4 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 4 31B IT has 35 scored results on Noometry and Mistral Nemo has 10.

Related comparisons

Go deeper