Model comparison

MiMo-V2-Omni vs Mistral Nemo

MiMo-V2-Omni is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.6 to 26.4 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.

MiMo-V2-Omni Xiaomi

43.6

Rank #88 Confirmed

Mistral Nemo Mistral AI

26.4

Rank #337 Confirmed

Summary

  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where MiMo-V2-Omni leads 61.4 to 28.5.
  • Mistral Nemo is cheaper at $0.15 / $0.15 per million input/output tokens, against $0.14 / $0.28 for MiMo-V2-Omni.
  • MiMo-V2-Omni accepts more context: 262K tokens versus 128K.
  • Mistral Nemo has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

MiMo-V2-Omni and Mistral Nemo specifications
MiMo-V2-OmniMistral Nemo
ProviderXiaomiMistral AI
Noometry Index43.626.4
Released2026-03-182024-07-01
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window262K128K
Max output131K128K
Input $ / M tokens$0.14$0.15
Output $ / M tokens$0.28$0.15
Results tracked1810

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Not comparable

MiMo-V2-Omni: 43.3 (#89), Mistral Nemo: —

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkMiMo-V2-OmniMistral Nemo
LMArena Coding1466—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

MiMo-V2-Omni: —, Mistral Nemo: 23.5 (#125)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkMiMo-V2-OmniMistral Nemo
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard—27.6%
BALROG—17.6%

Reasoning MiMo-V2-Omni leads

MiMo-V2-Omni: 29.7 (#88), Mistral Nemo: 20.7 (#232)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkMiMo-V2-OmniMistral Nemo
LMArena Hard Prompts1445—
DTBench—48.6%
Epoch Capabilities Index—118.68
PIQA—83.5%

Math MiMo-V2-Omni leads

MiMo-V2-Omni: 39.1 (#115), Mistral Nemo: 25.5 (#268)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkMiMo-V2-OmniMistral Nemo
LMArena Math1430—
MATH Level 5—10.8%
GSM8K—84.2%

Knowledge MiMo-V2-Omni leads

MiMo-V2-Omni: 40.5 (#118), Mistral Nemo: 12.3 (#298)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkMiMo-V2-OmniMistral Nemo
GPQA Diamond—29.9%
LMArena Expert1449—
BoolQ—82.5%

Multimodal Not comparable

MiMo-V2-Omni: 38.6 (#63), Mistral Nemo: —

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkMiMo-V2-OmniMistral Nemo
LMArena Vision1228—

Multilingual Not comparable

MiMo-V2-Omni: 51.8 (#102), Mistral Nemo: —

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkMiMo-V2-OmniMistral Nemo
LMArena Non-English1404—
LMArena Chinese1465—
LMArena French1447—
LMArena German1399—
LMArena Japanese1317—
LMArena Korean1355—
LMArena Russian1412—
LMArena Spanish1434—

Instruction Following Not comparable

MiMo-V2-Omni: 75.2 (#66), Mistral Nemo: —

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkMiMo-V2-OmniMistral Nemo
LMArena Instruction Following1428—

Long Context Not comparable

MiMo-V2-Omni: 44.1 (#76), Mistral Nemo: —

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkMiMo-V2-OmniMistral Nemo
LMArena Longer Query1442—

Writing & Preference MiMo-V2-Omni leads

MiMo-V2-Omni: 61.4 (#87), Mistral Nemo: 28.5 (#296)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkMiMo-V2-OmniMistral Nemo
LMArena Text1423—
LMArena Creative Writing1392—
EQ-Bench Creative Writing—881
LMArena Multi-Turn1445—

Frequently asked questions

Is MiMo-V2-Omni better than Mistral Nemo?

MiMo-V2-Omni is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.6 to 26.4 on the Noometry Index.

Which is cheaper, MiMo-V2-Omni or Mistral Nemo?

Mistral Nemo is cheaper. It lists at $0.15 per million input tokens and $0.15 per million output tokens; MiMo-V2-Omni lists at $0.14 and $0.28.

Which has the bigger context window?

MiMo-V2-Omni does, with 262K tokens against 128K.

How many benchmarks do MiMo-V2-Omni and Mistral Nemo share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. MiMo-V2-Omni has 18 scored results on Noometry and Mistral Nemo has 10.

Related comparisons

Go deeper