Model comparison

Gemma 4 31B IT vs Qwen3-1.7B

Gemma 4 31B IT is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.5 to 26.6 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 3 shared benchmarks.

Gemma 4 31B IT Google

43.5

Rank #90 Confirmed

Qwen3-1.7B Alibaba (Qwen)

26.6

Rank #336 Reported

Summary

  • They share 3 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemma 4 31B IT scores higher in 3 categories and Qwen3-1.7B in 0 categories; 3 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in math, where Gemma 4 31B IT leads 43.2 to 16.3.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025: 73.3% for Gemma 4 31B IT and 8.1% for Qwen3-1.7B.

Side by side

Gemma 4 31B IT and Qwen3-1.7B specifications
Gemma 4 31B ITQwen3-1.7B
ProviderGoogleAlibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index43.526.6
Released2026-04-022025-04-29
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window262K—
Max output33K—
Input $ / M tokens$0.09—
Output $ / M tokens$0.34—
Results tracked354

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Not comparable

Gemma 4 31B IT: 42.3 (#108), Qwen3-1.7B: —

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 4 31B ITQwen3-1.7B
LMArena WebDev1366—
SciCode43.4%—
WeirdML52.3%—
LMArena Coding1459—
ALE-Bench925.5—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Gemma 4 31B IT: —, Qwen3-1.7B: 24.7 (#115)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 4 31B ITQwen3-1.7B
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard—28.4%

Reasoning Gemma 4 31B IT leads

Gemma 4 31B IT: 27.2 (#122), Qwen3-1.7B: 19.2 (#267)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 4 31B ITQwen3-1.7B
Chess Puzzles5%0%
Kagi LLM Benchmark63.5%—
NYT Connections (extended)70.6%—
CritPt1.4%—
Thematic Generalization53%—
LMArena Hard Prompts1448—
DTBench82.7%—
LMCA39.3%—
Surface Evolver Bench30.6%—
Epoch Capabilities Index142.74—

Math Gemma 4 31B IT leads

Gemma 4 31B IT: 43.2 (#81), Qwen3-1.7B: 16.3 (#294)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 4 31B ITQwen3-1.7B
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202573.3%8.1%
LMArena Math1465—

Knowledge Gemma 4 31B IT leads

Gemma 4 31B IT: 37.9 (#151), Qwen3-1.7B: 19.6 (#278)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 4 31B ITQwen3-1.7B
GPQA Diamond75.8%38%
SimpleQA Verified10.4%—
Vectara Hallucination Rate7.4%—
LMArena Expert1465—

Multimodal Not comparable

Gemma 4 31B IT: 41.6 (#34), Qwen3-1.7B: —

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 4 31B ITQwen3-1.7B
LMArena Vision1277—
LMArena Document1425—

Multilingual Not comparable

Gemma 4 31B IT: 53.8 (#57), Qwen3-1.7B: —

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 4 31B ITQwen3-1.7B
LMArena Non-English1431—
LMArena Chinese1476—
LMArena French1435—
LMArena Russian1460—
LMArena Spanish1444—

Instruction Following Not comparable

Gemma 4 31B IT: 75.5 (#61), Qwen3-1.7B: —

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 4 31B ITQwen3-1.7B
LMArena Instruction Following1433—

Long Context Not comparable

Gemma 4 31B IT: 44.2 (#71), Qwen3-1.7B: —

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 4 31B ITQwen3-1.7B
LMArena Longer Query1446—

Writing & Preference Not comparable

Gemma 4 31B IT: 60.5 (#96), Qwen3-1.7B: —

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 4 31B ITQwen3-1.7B
LMArena Text1443—
LMArena Creative Writing1415—
EQ-Bench Creative Writing1368—
EQ-Bench 41120—
LMArena Multi-Turn1452—

Frequently asked questions

Is Gemma 4 31B IT better than Qwen3-1.7B?

Gemma 4 31B IT is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.5 to 26.6 on the Noometry Index.

How many benchmarks do Gemma 4 31B IT and Qwen3-1.7B share?

3 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 4 31B IT has 35 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3-1.7B has 4.

Related comparisons

Go deeper