Model comparison

Gemma 4 26B A4B IT vs Wizardlm 70b

Gemma 4 26B A4B IT is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.5 to 33.0 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 11 shared benchmarks.

Gemma 4 26B A4B IT Google

43.5

Rank #92 Confirmed

Wizardlm 70b Microsoft

33.0

Rank #249 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 11 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemma 4 26B A4B IT scores higher in 7 categories and Wizardlm 70b in 0 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Gemma 4 26B A4B IT leads 58.6 to 34.8.

Side by side

Gemma 4 26B A4B IT and Wizardlm 70b specifications
Gemma 4 26B A4B ITWizardlm 70b
ProviderGoogleMicrosoft
Noometry Index43.533.0
Released2026-04-02—
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window262K—
Max output33K—
Input $ / M tokens$0.0675—
Output $ / M tokens$0.23—
Results tracked2812

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Gemma 4 26B A4B IT leads

Gemma 4 26B A4B IT: 39.0 (#164), Wizardlm 70b: 31.4 (#285)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 4 26B A4B ITWizardlm 70b
LMArena Coding14471081
LMArena WebDev1359—
SciCode40%—
WeirdML35.2%—
ALE-Bench927.17—

Reasoning Gemma 4 26B A4B IT leads

Gemma 4 26B A4B IT: 21.8 (#213), Wizardlm 70b: 20.7 (#234)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 4 26B A4B ITWizardlm 70b
LMArena Hard Prompts14391079
CritPt0%—
Chess Puzzles6%—
DTBench74.9%—
LMCA29.7%—
Epoch Capabilities Index141.85—

Math Gemma 4 26B A4B IT leads

Gemma 4 26B A4B IT: 47.6 (#67), Wizardlm 70b: 32.2 (#218)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 4 26B A4B ITWizardlm 70b
LMArena Math14701116
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202582.2%—

Knowledge Not comparable

Gemma 4 26B A4B IT: 45.7 (#85), Wizardlm 70b: —

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 4 26B A4B ITWizardlm 70b
GPQA Diamond73.2%—
Vectara Hallucination Rate5.2%—
LMArena Expert1447—

Multimodal Not comparable

Gemma 4 26B A4B IT: 40.6 (#46), Wizardlm 70b: —

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 4 26B A4B ITWizardlm 70b
LMArena Vision1260—

Multilingual Gemma 4 26B A4B IT leads

Gemma 4 26B A4B IT: 53.1 (#71), Wizardlm 70b: 29.6 (#265)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 4 26B A4B ITWizardlm 70b
LMArena Non-English14211078
LMArena Chinese14951052
LMArena Russian14341155
LMArena French1460—
LMArena German—1083
LMArena Spanish1417—

Instruction Following Gemma 4 26B A4B IT leads

Gemma 4 26B A4B IT: 74.8 (#82), Wizardlm 70b: 56.3 (#273)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 4 26B A4B ITWizardlm 70b
LMArena Instruction Following14201093

Long Context Gemma 4 26B A4B IT leads

Gemma 4 26B A4B IT: 43.6 (#91), Wizardlm 70b: 33.3 (#263)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 4 26B A4B ITWizardlm 70b
LMArena Longer Query14281097

Writing & Preference Gemma 4 26B A4B IT leads

Gemma 4 26B A4B IT: 58.6 (#115), Wizardlm 70b: 34.8 (#269)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 4 26B A4B ITWizardlm 70b
LMArena Text14341120
LMArena Creative Writing14021149
LMArena Multi-Turn14411108
EQ-Bench Creative Writing1305—

Frequently asked questions

Is Gemma 4 26B A4B IT better than Wizardlm 70b?

Gemma 4 26B A4B IT is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.5 to 33.0 on the Noometry Index.

Is Gemma 4 26B A4B IT or Wizardlm 70b better for coding?

Gemma 4 26B A4B IT scores higher on coding benchmarks: 39.0 versus 31.4 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Gemma 4 26B A4B IT and Wizardlm 70b share?

11 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 4 26B A4B IT has 28 scored results on Noometry and Wizardlm 70b has 12.

Related comparisons

Go deeper