Model comparison

Gemma 4 26B A4B IT vs Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct

Gemma 4 26B A4B IT is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.5 to 33.0 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 14 shared benchmarks.

Gemma 4 26B A4B IT Google

43.5

Rank #92 Confirmed

Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct Microsoft

33.0

Rank #250 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 14 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemma 4 26B A4B IT scores higher in 8 categories and Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct in 0 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Gemma 4 26B A4B IT leads 58.6 to 34.1.

Side by side

Gemma 4 26B A4B IT and Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct specifications
Gemma 4 26B A4B ITPhi 3 Medium 4k Instruct
ProviderGoogleMicrosoft
Noometry Index43.533.0
Released2026-04-02—
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window262K—
Max output33K—
Input $ / M tokens$0.0675—
Output $ / M tokens$0.23—
Results tracked2817

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Gemma 4 26B A4B IT leads

Gemma 4 26B A4B IT: 39.0 (#164), Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct: 32.9 (#268)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 4 26B A4B ITPhi 3 Medium 4k Instruct
LMArena Coding14471130
LMArena WebDev1359—
SciCode40%—
WeirdML35.2%—
ALE-Bench927.17—

Reasoning Too close to call

Gemma 4 26B A4B IT: 21.8 (#213), Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct: 21.7 (#214)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 4 26B A4B ITPhi 3 Medium 4k Instruct
LMArena Hard Prompts14391127
CritPt0%—
Chess Puzzles6%—
DTBench74.9%—
LMCA29.7%—
Epoch Capabilities Index141.85—

Math Gemma 4 26B A4B IT leads

Gemma 4 26B A4B IT: 47.6 (#67), Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct: 33.4 (#202)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 4 26B A4B ITPhi 3 Medium 4k Instruct
LMArena Math14701173
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202582.2%—

Knowledge Gemma 4 26B A4B IT leads

Gemma 4 26B A4B IT: 45.7 (#85), Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct: 30.2 (#229)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 4 26B A4B ITPhi 3 Medium 4k Instruct
LMArena Expert14471108
GPQA Diamond73.2%—
Vectara Hallucination Rate5.2%—

Multimodal Not comparable

Gemma 4 26B A4B IT: 40.6 (#46), Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct: —

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 4 26B A4B ITPhi 3 Medium 4k Instruct
LMArena Vision1260—

Multilingual Gemma 4 26B A4B IT leads

Gemma 4 26B A4B IT: 53.1 (#71), Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct: 30.6 (#263)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 4 26B A4B ITPhi 3 Medium 4k Instruct
LMArena Non-English14211094
LMArena Chinese14951108
LMArena French14601110
LMArena Russian14341145
LMArena Spanish14171095
LMArena German—1101
LMArena Japanese—1042
LMArena Korean—954

Instruction Following Gemma 4 26B A4B IT leads

Gemma 4 26B A4B IT: 74.8 (#82), Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct: 57.6 (#268)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 4 26B A4B ITPhi 3 Medium 4k Instruct
LMArena Instruction Following14201113

Long Context Gemma 4 26B A4B IT leads

Gemma 4 26B A4B IT: 43.6 (#91), Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct: 34.0 (#255)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 4 26B A4B ITPhi 3 Medium 4k Instruct
LMArena Longer Query14281120

Writing & Preference Gemma 4 26B A4B IT leads

Gemma 4 26B A4B IT: 58.6 (#115), Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct: 34.1 (#272)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 4 26B A4B ITPhi 3 Medium 4k Instruct
LMArena Text14341138
LMArena Creative Writing14021107
LMArena Multi-Turn14411088
EQ-Bench Creative Writing1305—

Frequently asked questions

Is Gemma 4 26B A4B IT better than Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct?

Gemma 4 26B A4B IT is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.5 to 33.0 on the Noometry Index.

Is Gemma 4 26B A4B IT or Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct better for coding?

Gemma 4 26B A4B IT scores higher on coding benchmarks: 39.0 versus 32.9 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Gemma 4 26B A4B IT and Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct share?

14 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 4 26B A4B IT has 28 scored results on Noometry and Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct has 17.

Related comparisons

Go deeper