Model comparison
Gemma 3n E4b IT vs Qwen Turbo
Gemma 3n E4b IT is the stronger model overall, scoring 36.7 to 26.8 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Google
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- The widest gap is in math, where Gemma 3n E4b IT leads 32.5 to 14.5.
- Gemma 3n E4b IT is cheaper at $0.06 / $0.12 per million input/output tokens, against $0.05 / $0.20 for Qwen Turbo.
- Qwen Turbo accepts more context: 1M tokens versus 33K.
- Gemma 3n E4b IT has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Gemma 3n E4b IT | Qwen Turbo | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Alibaba (Qwen) | |
| Noometry Index | 36.7 | 26.8 |
| Released | 2025-05-20 | 2024-11-01 |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |
| Context window | 33K | 1M |
| Max output | 33K | 16K |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.06 | $0.05 |
| Output $ / M tokens | $0.12 | $0.20 |
| Results tracked | 18 | 3 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
Gemma 3n E4b IT: 36.4 (#193), Qwen Turbo: —
| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Qwen Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1269 | — |
Reasoning Not comparable
Gemma 3n E4b IT: 19.2 (#239), Qwen Turbo: —
| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Qwen Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 31.5% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1284 | — |
Math Gemma 3n E4b IT leads
Gemma 3n E4b IT: 32.5 (#186), Qwen Turbo: 14.5 (#291)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Qwen Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 6.1% |
| LMArena Math | 1251 | — |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 56.2% |
Knowledge Gemma 3n E4b IT leads
Gemma 3n E4b IT: 33.6 (#193), Qwen Turbo: 22.2 (#267)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Qwen Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 41.8% |
| LMArena Expert | 1245 | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
Gemma 3n E4b IT: 43.5 (#179), Qwen Turbo: —
| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Qwen Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1285 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1310 | — |
| LMArena French | 1330 | — |
| LMArena German | 1312 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1274 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1259 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1288 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1305 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Gemma 3n E4b IT: 66.3 (#205), Qwen Turbo: —
| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Qwen Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1255 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
Gemma 3n E4b IT: 38.8 (#185), Qwen Turbo: —
| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Qwen Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1277 | — |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Gemma 3n E4b IT: 50.3 (#181), Qwen Turbo: —
| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Qwen Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1306 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1287 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1276 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemma 3n E4b IT better than Qwen Turbo?
Gemma 3n E4b IT is the stronger model overall, scoring 36.7 to 26.8 on the Noometry Index.
Which is cheaper, Gemma 3n E4b IT or Qwen Turbo?
Gemma 3n E4b IT is cheaper. It lists at $0.06 per million input tokens and $0.12 per million output tokens; Qwen Turbo lists at $0.05 and $0.20.
Which has the bigger context window?
Qwen Turbo does, with 1M tokens against 33K.
How many benchmarks do Gemma 3n E4b IT and Qwen Turbo share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 3n E4b IT has 18 scored results on Noometry and Qwen Turbo has 3.