Model comparison
Gemini 1.0 Pro vs Gemma 3n E4b IT
Gemma 3n E4b IT is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.3 to 27.3 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 16 shared benchmarks.
GoogleSummary
- They share 16 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 1.0 Pro scores higher in 0 categories and Gemma 3n E4b IT in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where Gemma 3n E4b IT leads 35.1 to 9.3.
- Gemma 3n E4b IT has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Gemini 1.0 Pro | Gemma 3n E4b IT | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | ||
| Noometry Index | 27.3 | 37.3 |
| Released | 2023-12-13 | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 24 | 18 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Gemma 3n E4b IT leads
Gemini 1.0 Pro: 32.2 (#275), Gemma 3n E4b IT: 37.0 (#198)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Gemma 3n E4b IT |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1108 | 1268 |
| HumanEval+ | 55.5% | — |
| MBPP+ | 61.4% | — |
Reasoning Gemma 3n E4b IT leads
Gemini 1.0 Pro: 17.1 (#296), Gemma 3n E4b IT: 19.9 (#247)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Gemma 3n E4b IT |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1109 | 1284 |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 31.5% |
| DTBench | 45.9% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 117.04 | — |
Math Gemma 3n E4b IT leads
Gemini 1.0 Pro: 9.3 (#321), Gemma 3n E4b IT: 35.1 (#188)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Gemma 3n E4b IT |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1132 | 1251 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 1.1% | — |
| MATH Level 5 | 11.2% | — |
Knowledge Gemma 3n E4b IT leads
Gemini 1.0 Pro: 15.6 (#291), Gemma 3n E4b IT: 34.2 (#198)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Gemma 3n E4b IT |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1059 | 1246 |
| GPQA Diamond | 34% | — |
| MMLU | 70% | — |
Multilingual Gemma 3n E4b IT leads
Gemini 1.0 Pro: 33.4 (#252), Gemma 3n E4b IT: 43.4 (#183)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Gemma 3n E4b IT |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1138 | 1285 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1124 | 1309 |
| LMArena French | 1145 | 1330 |
| LMArena German | 1125 | 1311 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1023 | 1272 |
| LMArena Russian | 1186 | 1288 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1119 | 1305 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1259 |
Instruction Following Gemma 3n E4b IT leads
Gemini 1.0 Pro: 57.6 (#267), Gemma 3n E4b IT: 66.1 (#210)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Gemma 3n E4b IT |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1114 | 1255 |
Long Context Gemma 3n E4b IT leads
Gemini 1.0 Pro: 34.3 (#249), Gemma 3n E4b IT: 38.7 (#191)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Gemma 3n E4b IT |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1132 | 1276 |
Writing & Preference Gemma 3n E4b IT leads
Gemini 1.0 Pro: 36.0 (#264), Gemma 3n E4b IT: 50.1 (#186)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Gemma 3n E4b IT |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1149 | 1306 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1131 | 1287 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1139 | 1276 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemini 1.0 Pro better than Gemma 3n E4b IT?
Gemma 3n E4b IT is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.3 to 27.3 on the Noometry Index.
Is Gemini 1.0 Pro or Gemma 3n E4b IT better for coding?
Gemma 3n E4b IT scores higher on coding benchmarks: 37.0 versus 32.2 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Gemini 1.0 Pro and Gemma 3n E4b IT share?
16 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 1.0 Pro has 24 scored results on Noometry and Gemma 3n E4b IT has 18.