Model comparison
Gemma 3n E4b IT vs Phi-4 Mini
Gemma 3n E4b IT is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.3 to 30.9 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Summary
- The widest gap is in coding, where Gemma 3n E4b IT leads 37.0 to 28.1.
Side by side
| Gemma 3n E4b IT | Phi-4 Mini | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Microsoft | |
| Noometry Index | 37.3 | 30.9 |
| Released | — | 2024-12-11 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | 128K |
| Max output | — | 4K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.075 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $0.30 |
| Results tracked | 18 | 3 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Gemma 3n E4b IT leads
Gemma 3n E4b IT: 37.0 (#198), Phi-4 Mini: 28.1 (#317)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Phi-4 Mini |
|---|---|---|
| SciCode | — | 10.8% |
| LMArena Coding | 1268 | — |
Reasoning Phi-4 Mini leads
Gemma 3n E4b IT: 19.9 (#247), Phi-4 Mini: 22.4 (#195)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Phi-4 Mini |
|---|---|---|
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 31.5% | — |
| CritPt | — | 0% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1284 | — |
Math Not comparable
Gemma 3n E4b IT: 35.1 (#188), Phi-4 Mini: —
| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Phi-4 Mini |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1251 | — |
Knowledge Gemma 3n E4b IT leads
Gemma 3n E4b IT: 34.2 (#198), Phi-4 Mini: 25.3 (#262)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Phi-4 Mini |
|---|---|---|
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | — | 23.5% |
| LMArena Expert | 1246 | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
Gemma 3n E4b IT: 43.4 (#183), Phi-4 Mini: —
| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Phi-4 Mini |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1285 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1309 | — |
| LMArena French | 1330 | — |
| LMArena German | 1311 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1272 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1259 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1288 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1305 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Gemma 3n E4b IT: 66.1 (#210), Phi-4 Mini: —
| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Phi-4 Mini |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1255 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
Gemma 3n E4b IT: 38.7 (#191), Phi-4 Mini: —
| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Phi-4 Mini |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1276 | — |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Gemma 3n E4b IT: 50.1 (#186), Phi-4 Mini: —
| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Phi-4 Mini |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1306 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1287 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1276 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemma 3n E4b IT better than Phi-4 Mini?
Gemma 3n E4b IT is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.3 to 30.9 on the Noometry Index.
Is Gemma 3n E4b IT or Phi-4 Mini better for coding?
Gemma 3n E4b IT scores higher on coding benchmarks: 37.0 versus 28.1 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Gemma 3n E4b IT and Phi-4 Mini share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 3n E4b IT has 18 scored results on Noometry and Phi-4 Mini has 3.