Model comparison
Gemma 3 27B vs Gemma 3n E4b IT
Gemma 3n E4b IT is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.3 to 30.8 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 18 shared benchmarks.
Summary
- They share 18 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemma 3 27B scores higher in 3 categories and Gemma 3n E4b IT in 5 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in coding, where Gemma 3n E4b IT leads 37.0 to 22.5.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is Kagi LLM Benchmark: 40.4% for Gemma 3 27B and 31.5% for Gemma 3n E4b IT.
Side by side
| Gemma 3 27B | Gemma 3n E4b IT | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | ||
| Noometry Index | 30.8 | 37.3 |
| Released | 2025-03-11 | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | 131K | — |
| Max output | 8K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.08 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $0.16 | — |
| Results tracked | 43 | 18 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Gemma 3n E4b IT leads
Gemma 3 27B: 22.5 (#334), Gemma 3n E4b IT: 37.0 (#198)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3 27B | Gemma 3n E4b IT |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1322 | 1268 |
| Aider Polyglot | 4.9% | — |
| SciCode | 21.2% | — |
| LiveBench Coding | 39.9% | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Gemma 3 27B: 25.1 (#110), Gemma 3n E4b IT: —
| Benchmark | Gemma 3 27B | Gemma 3n E4b IT |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | 29.5% | — |
Reasoning Gemma 3n E4b IT leads
Gemma 3 27B: 16.7 (#301), Gemma 3n E4b IT: 19.9 (#247)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3 27B | Gemma 3n E4b IT |
|---|---|---|
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 40.4% | 31.5% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1340 | 1284 |
| CritPt | 0% | — |
| Chess Puzzles | 0% | — |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 43.8% | — |
| DTBench | 52.5% | — |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 51.5% | — |
| LMCA | 12.3% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 130.04 | — |
| LiveBench | 50% | — |
Math Gemma 3n E4b IT leads
Gemma 3 27B: 25.9 (#265), Gemma 3n E4b IT: 35.1 (#188)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3 27B | Gemma 3n E4b IT |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1312 | 1251 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 22.5% | — |
| LiveBench Math | 55.4% | — |
| MATH Level 5 | 74% | — |
Knowledge Gemma 3n E4b IT leads
Gemma 3 27B: 25.5 (#261), Gemma 3n E4b IT: 34.2 (#198)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3 27B | Gemma 3n E4b IT |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1304 | 1246 |
| GPQA Diamond | 47.7% | — |
| Confabulations | 40.3% | — |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 7.4% | — |
Multimodal Not comparable
Gemma 3 27B: 32.6 (#100), Gemma 3n E4b IT: —
| Benchmark | Gemma 3 27B | Gemma 3n E4b IT |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1164 | — |
| GeoBench | 52% | — |
Multilingual Gemma 3 27B leads
Gemma 3 27B: 46.9 (#155), Gemma 3n E4b IT: 43.4 (#183)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3 27B | Gemma 3n E4b IT |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1334 | 1285 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1346 | 1309 |
| LMArena French | 1368 | 1330 |
| LMArena German | 1362 | 1311 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1287 | 1272 |
| LMArena Korean | 1308 | 1259 |
| LMArena Russian | 1349 | 1288 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1349 | 1305 |
Instruction Following Gemma 3 27B leads
Gemma 3 27B: 70.6 (#160), Gemma 3n E4b IT: 66.1 (#210)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3 27B | Gemma 3n E4b IT |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1321 | 1255 |
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 74.9% | — |
Long Context Gemma 3n E4b IT leads
Gemma 3 27B: 27.6 (#293), Gemma 3n E4b IT: 38.7 (#191)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3 27B | Gemma 3n E4b IT |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1333 | 1276 |
| Fiction.LiveBench | 33.3% | — |
Writing & Preference Gemma 3 27B leads
Gemma 3 27B: 52.5 (#168), Gemma 3n E4b IT: 50.1 (#186)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3 27B | Gemma 3n E4b IT |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1358 | 1306 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1346 | 1287 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1345 | 1276 |
| Short-Story Creative Writing | 79.9% | — |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1266 | — |
| LiveBench Language | 34.6% | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemma 3 27B better than Gemma 3n E4b IT?
Gemma 3n E4b IT is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.3 to 30.8 on the Noometry Index.
Is Gemma 3 27B or Gemma 3n E4b IT better for coding?
Gemma 3n E4b IT scores higher on coding benchmarks: 37.0 versus 22.5 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Gemma 3 27B and Gemma 3n E4b IT share?
18 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 3 27B has 43 scored results on Noometry and Gemma 3n E4b IT has 18.